The following documents were obtained in trying to decipher who’s legal responsibility it is to verify that a presidential candidate qualifies to run for president, i.e., meets the 3 basic qualifications required by the United States Constitution. The American public assumes this has been done for all candidates, as it SHOULD BE. Turns out the sole responsibility a candidate qualifies falls on:
1) The candidate (Barack Obama)
2) The party (Nancy Pelosi & the DNC Chair)
Illegal President Barack Obama
BARACK OBAMA’S SWORN & NOTARIZED STATEMENT TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA THAT HE IS A “NATURAL U.S. BORN CITIZEN”
Barack Obama’s sworn, signed and notorized State of Arizona “Candidate Nomination Paper” swearing he’s a “natural born citizen of the United States. THIS DOCUMENT IS MOST SIGNIFCANT BECAUSE HE SPECIFICALLY CERTIFIES HE IS A “NATURAL BORN U.S. CITIZEN.” [SEE HIS PERJURIOUS STATEMENT HERE]
AND SEE NANCY PELOSI’S PURJURIOUS DOCUMENTS HERE:
Here’s my findings:
- Nancy Pelosi didn’t just certify that Obama was nominated: she certified Obama was DULY nominated. BIG DIFFERENCE. KEY WORD: “DULY.”
- “Duly” nominated means “properly” nominated.
- “Properly” nominated means he met all the legal qualifications for president, including being a natural born citizen. But he was not “duly” [properly] nominated because a candidate cannot be “duly” nominated if they are not a natural born citizen, just like a candidate could not be “duly” nominated if they are under 35 years old.
- By law, Secretary of States are not responsible nor have the duty nor are legally authorized to investigate whether a presidential candidate meets the requirements. The Secretary of State is ministerial in the nomination process; by law, as long as the papers are filed properly on their face, the Secretary of State must place the candidate on the ballot. So it will not be winnable to bring lawsuits against the Secretary of State.
- By state law it is both the national political party and each separate state’s political party’s responsibility. It is the party’s duty and they have the legal authority and responsibility to investigate and verify whether a candidate meets the requirements, otherwise that candidate cannot truthfully be “duly” nominated. CASE IN POINT: SEE STATE OF HAWAII OFFICE OF ELECTIONS RESPONSE BELOW WHERE THEY CLEARLY STATE THEY CANNOT PLACE A CANDIDATE ON THE BALLOT UNLESS THEY HAVE A STATEMENT BY THE POLITICAL PARTY THAT EACH CANDIDATE IS LEGALLY QUALIFIED TO SERVE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and more, yet we know for a fact that this was never verified nor qualified since no one has ever actually seen Obama’s real birth certificate because it’s been under lock and key in a vault.
CLICK HERE-> hawaii-response
- Nancy Peolsi is in charge of the National Democrat Party so she is ultimately responsible. But although she has a duty to investigate any reasonable doubts about a candidate’s eligibility, she too relies on the DNC Chair of each state’s certification of the candidate and bases her ultimate approval of the candidate on those certifications. And of course this would be her “legal defense.” However, maybe not a solid defense since there was enough reasonable doubt whether Obama was a natural born US citizen to warrant verification. Yet no verification was done. Still, may not be a fruitful case against Nancy Pelosi.
- HERE’S WHERE THE REAL FAULT LIES: The party Chair of each state: IT IS THEY THAT must certify their candidate meets all the requirements before the head of the National Democrat party [Nancy Pelosi] can “duly” nominate the candidate. Nancy Pelosi bases her ultimate certification of nomination on their certifications. Then the Secretary of State places the candidate on the ballot based on all of the above. Then sadly, the unsuspecting American public goes to the voting booth trusting the candidate was qualified based on that nomination.
- The fault really falls on the DNC Chairs of each state. And if any suit is to be brought forth, this is the place to start. Pick a state, start with one that certified Obama specifically citing he was a natural born U.S. citizen [like Arizona]. And since no one has ever seen Obama’s actual certificate of live birth, since it has been locked in a vault, that is proof his qualifications were never verified, therefore he was not qualified and not duly nominated. There was also reasonable doubt whether Obama was a natural born US citizen, certainly enough to warrant verification of his certificate of live birth. And because of that, it is a proven fact that was never done.
- If the court says an American citizen like Berg doesn’t have standing to bring a suit against Obama, perhaps a member of the democrat party [which would mean YOU or any citizen registered as a member of the democrat party] could bring suit or perhaps a class action suit against the democrat party in their state? The premise of the suit would be that they did not verify their candidate’s birthplace status, yet they officially qualified him. Bringing suit against Nancy Pelosi would be a mess because she would just say she was only relying on the certifications of the state DNC Chairs. But what legitimate excuse could the DNC Chairs have? CHECK INTO THIS.
- Perhaps we could start by requesting documents pursuant to the Public Records Act (PRA) that show the DNC verified that Obama met all the qualifications. Of course they would have to reply back “sorry, your request is denied because we do not have any such documents.” And you know why? BECAUSE THEY NEVER VETTED NOR VERIFIED Obama. Certainly there is some kind of law against LYING or making false statements in an official capacity? They certified he met all the requirements when he doesn’t meet the requirements. The proof is they never verified his certificate of live birth because his real birth certificate has been locked up in a vault and no one in the DNC has seen it.
Notes how I came to this conclusion are below:
******************* WORKSHEET & NOTES ********************
The following are documents I obtained by emailing my request to the Secretary of State in 50+ states. My first attempt was to make my requests pursuant to “The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),” but I soon found out by the responses back that individual states are not subject to the FOIA because the FOIA is a FEDERAL agency; and that the proper way to request documents was to make requests pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA).” I was also told to be more specific in the documents I was requesting. I then resubmitted my requests pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA) and I requested copies of the filing papers filed by Barack Obama to run for president in each state; and each state’s code of laws for certification of candidates.
NOTE: There were a few Secretary of States that did send me some documents even though they noted in the response that I had sent the request pursuant to the FIOC instead of the proper way to the PRA.
Some SOS offices also told me it would be good to direct my requests to the State ELECTION BOARD. But regardless who you attention it to, to do it pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA),” and NOT THE “Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).”
Report of Findings:
1). Request for documents are to be made pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA)” [not the Federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)]
2). Secretary of State not legally responsible nor has the legal authority to determine eligibility or investigate whether a presidential candidate meets all the qualifications. By law it is the POLITICAL PARTY’S RESPONSIBILITY, aka Nancy Peolsi & the DNC…
Every SOS so far has informed me that by state law, the responsibility to determine eligibility or investigate whether a presidential candidate meets all the qualifications to run for president is the Political Party’s responsibility and not the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State’s role is more of an administrative one, as they have no authority to investigate or question a candidate’s eligibility. Per law, if the filing documents filed by the political party are complete on their face, The Secretary of State must accept them without question and place the candidate on the ballot. In Obama’s case, that political party responsible to vet Obama would be the DNC [Democrat Party] under Nancy Pelosi. But since Obama never released his real birth certificate to anyone, then obviously Nancy Peolosi never actually verified if he was qualified or not. So if there was no “verification” done, then why’d she sign her name certifying Obama was “duly,”[properly] nominated? The official certification of nomination is not an autograph book! The Secretaries of State rely on and trust that official signature signifying everything is in order before they place a candidate on the ballot. Nancy Pelosi is ultimately responsible for making sure a candidate meets all the presidential requirements. She did not do that.
THE FOLLOWING ARE RESPONSE LETTERS I GOT BACK FROM SECRETARY OF STATES CONFIRMING “THE STATE IS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE BY LAW TO VERIFY CANDIDATES, AND THAT IS THE DUTY OF THE POLITICAL PARTY. And if the paperwork appears on its face to be complete, then the state by law MUST place that candidate on the ballot” [I did not post them all because each state said that same thing]:
ALABAMA SECRETARY OF STATE: NOT RESPONSIBLE
FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE: NOT RESPONSIBLE
KENTUCKY SECRETARY OF STATE: NOT RESPONSIBLE
MICHIGAN SECRETARY OF STATE NOT RESPONSIBLE
MONTANA SECRETARY OF STATE: NOT RESPONSIBLE
SOUTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE: NOT RESPONSIBLE
STATE OF HAWAII: HAWAIIAN STATE LAW CLEARLY STATES IT IS THE POLITICAL PARTY’S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY AND CONFIRM EACH CANDIDATE IS LEGALLY QUALIFIED TO SERVE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and they depend on this statement of confirmation in order to place a candidate on the ballot: CLICK HERE TO SEE HAWAII RESPONSE
3). Obama officially swore in writing in each state he ran for office that he was eligible and met all requirements to run for president. One particular document [Arizona] he even specifically swore he was a “natural born US citizen.” [HERE]
DISTURBING RESPONSES:This is very troubling and disturbing because we know Obama has never submitted his original certificate of live birth to anyone and it’s been sealed in a vault, so that means that the DNC not only never actually verified whether or not he met the birthplace qualifications, BUT NANCY PELOSI and CAROL FOWLER [DNC CHAIR for the State of South Carolina] and other DNC Chairs CERTIFIED BY SIGNATURE ON OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS SIGNIFYING THAT HE WAS [when he was NOT].
4) Who’s all responsible for and authorized to verify [certify] the candidates meet the requirements to run for president:
a) The candidate
BARACK OBAMA’S SWORN & NOTARIZED STATEMENT TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA THAT HE IS A “NATURAL U.S. BORN CITIZEN”
b) Nancy Pelosi [head of DNC]
Nancy Pelosi head of DNC
NANCY PELOSI IS RESPONSIBLE, SHE HAS THE LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DUTY TO INVESTIGATE AND VERIFY CANDIDATES MEET US CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. [CLICK BELOW TO SEE HER DISTURBING OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION OF OBAMA, even though his birthplace was not verified]. The state relies on this. Nancy Pelosi could try to use the excuse that she certified Obama because she relied on the DNC chairs in each state’s certifications that he met all the requirements.
c) The Democrat Party Chairman of each state- the real liability rests HERE. Even the State of Hawaii says so:
DEMOCRAT PARTY CHAIRS IN EACH STATE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND HAVE LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DUTY TO INVESTIGATE AND VERIFY ALL CANDIDATES MEET U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THEIR CERTIFICATIONS ARE THE MOST CRUCIAL BECAUSE NANCY PELOSI BASES HER ULTIMATE CERTIFICATION ON THE DNC CHAIR’S CERTIFICATION THAT THE CANDIDATE MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS.
[CLICK BELOW TO READ THE STATE DNC’S DISTURBING OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION, CERTIFYING OBAMA MEETS THE QUALIFICATIONS TO RUN AS PRESIDENT when in fact Obama’s birthplace was NEVER even verified]: room does not permit posting every state, but here’s some just to name a few:
Carol Fowler-SC DNC Chair
Laura Sanchez-NM Dem Exec Dir
Joe Turnham ALABAMA Dem Chair
Alabama Democrat Party Chairman Certifying under seal of the State Dem Exec Committee of Alabama that Obama filed qualifications with him but also states certification is subject to such disqualifications or corrective action as hereafter may appropriately be made.
Wayne Holland Jr UTAH Dem Chair
[Utah Democrat Party Chairman Wayne Holland Jr certifies to the Lt. Governor that Obama “has met the requirements and approved to run as president,” citing reasons such as public service, political service, accomplishment, public writings, public statements, yet these are NOT presidential requirements. HERE]. and obviously the important Constitutional requirements were not mentioned or verified.
Brian E. Schatz, Chair of Democrat Party of Hawaii
[Hawaii Democrat Party Chair Brian E. Schatz certified that Obama was “legally qualified,” yet has never seen nor inspected Obama’s original certificate of live birth [if he had he would’ve seen it was from Kenya] but he could not have since Obama’s original certificate of live birth has been under lock and key in a vault in his own state that even he was not and is not allowed to see. HERE]
But these are not the only DNC Chairs, each state party also certified Obama met all the requirements. [Too many to post here.]
5) The fact that hearsay taken out of context and conclusions drawn from unqualified statements made by Hawaii officials during a media press conference [and not a court of law] were surprisingly actually used and accepted by a judge to substantiate CT Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz’s defense in the Cort Wrotnowski case…per Susan Bysiewicz’s own admission in her letter below. But still, a mute point, because Secretary of States are not legally responsible to investigate a candidate’s qualifications anyway. So there’s no winning a suit against them.
Susan Bysiewicz CT Secretary of State
CONNECTICUT SECRETARY OF STATE [Susan Bysiewicz] DOCUMENT [MOST DISTURBING]
Connecticut Secretary of State [Susan Bysiewicz] defensive statement of excuse defending herself for certifying Obama was qualified to run for president [even though SOS are not responsible for vetting the presidential candidates] based on hearsay taken out of context from some unqualified statements made by Hawaiian officials at a press conference [not a court of law] in November 2008. She admits the Cort Wrotnowski case was dismissed based on her testimony of such. The problem with this is that Hawaiian officials never verified that Obama was in fact born in the State of Hawaii and they only said they hold a copy of his “original” birth certificate on file, and they refused to even confirm if that “original” birth certificate was a certificate of live birth in Kenya or Hawaii. The omittance of appropriate definition of terms, e.g. “certification” vs “certificate of live birth,” and others was sufficient enough to confuse apparently even the judge Susan Bysiewicz testified to. Also, the date she claims she made this verification [even though SOS are not legally responsible to verify a candidate] was on November 3, 2008 – almot 3 months AFTER the time of the general election. It’s important to note that the candidates were supposed to be verified BEFORE the general election, as a presidential candidate cannot even RUN for the office without being a natural born citizen. But a mute point since Obama’s birthplace status WAS NEVER VERIFIED IN THE FIRST PLACE because Obama has never released his original certificate of live birth for them to view.
6) The ultimate responsibility to verify if a presidential candidate meets the requirements for the office is the National Party [DNC]. AND regardless of what those protocols and standard of procedures are, the CONSTITUTION TRUMPS ALL. And whether or not the official certification signed by Nancy Pelosi or each State DNC Chair specifically states they verified his birthplace, doesn’t matter, because Nancy Pelosi signed her name to a document that says Obama was “DULY NOMINATED,”not just nominated, but DULY nominated. But Obama was not “duly” [properly] nominated. And the Secretary of State relies on that signature because it signifies the candidate is in fact qualified per the CONSTITUTION and enables the SOS to place him on the ballot.
KEY WORD = “DULY”
1. in a due manner; properly; appropriately, fittingly.
1. In a due, fit, or becoming manner; as it (anything) ought to be; properly; regularly.
[Antonymns: improperly, unduly, unsuitably.]
Synonym for rightfully (adv): lawfully, correctly, legally, DULY, justly, technically, strictly, fairly, equitably.
Again, read State of Hawaii Office of Elections who says their state law clearly says the political party must provide a statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provivisions of the United States Constitution AND the candidates are duly chosen: hawaii-response
JASON RIGGS of YOUR FELLOW CITIZEN BLOG is doing some good research and corresponding with various state officials on getting down to the meat of things on this issue. Read the latest he’s uncovered here: http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/
7) CONCLUSION: WE NEED TO GET SOMEONE to ENFORCE the CONSTITUTION. The Supreme Court doesn’t seem like they are too interested in doing that, the judges don’t either. So the real answer is finding a way to ENFORCE THE LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION…and you know the old saying “where there’s a will, there’s a way.” We must find that way.
AND there must be some way to sue the DNC Chair or DNC Committees; they are the ones that specifically certified that Obama met the qualifications when in fact they never verified that. It is their certifications that Nancy Pelosi based her certification on. True, the ULTIMATE responsibility lies with NANCY PELOSI. But the overt misstatement of facts lies with the DNC Chairs.
a) can citizens file a class action suit against the DNC Chairs or committees?
b) how did Obama get a drivers license without a certificate of live birth?
c) how did Obama get a passport without a certificate of live birth?
CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO HOME PAGE
(or scroll down to view notes, contacts, and sample letter)
Every single response I got back from 30 out of the 50+ states I contacted ALL SAID THE SAME THING: “THE STATE IS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE NOR AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO VERIFY CANDIDATES, OR INVESTIGATE WHETHER A PRESIDENTIAL OR VICE PRESIDENTIAL OR ANY OTHER CANDIDATE IS QUALIFIED AND THAT IT IS THE DUTY OF THE POLITICAL PARTY.
Sample letter I used:
Board of Elections, Secretary of State
Attn: Public Records Act, Request for records
This is a request under the Public Records Act (PRA). Please send the following documents for examining and photocopying:
1. Documents that show that Barack Obama is qualified to be President of the United States, including but not limited to:
a. Original birth certificate or document stating he is a natural born United States citizen
b. DNC or Democrat Party’s Certification of Candidates, whether it pertains to Barack Obama or all candidates in general.
c. Election Board’s Certification of Candidates, whether it pertains to Barack Obama or all candidates in general.
d. Official certification of Nomination of Barack Obama.
e. Document containing your state code of laws for certification or candidates; verification of qualifications.
f. Copies of application, submission or filing forms by Barack Obama to run for president in your state.
This is a continuing request into the future for 6 months.
If this is not the proper department, please forward to the Election Bureau/SOS.
I promise to pay reasonable search and duplication fees in connection with this request.
Please notify me if the charges will exceed ($20.00), so that I can decide whether to authorize a higher amount.
Thank you for your assistance, I look forward to receiving your reply within five business days, as required by law.
A PDF file via email is sufficient or you may mail the hardcopies to me here:
xxxxx. xxxx. xxxxxs
Cc: Clerk of the US Supreme Court
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543
FAX: (209) 479-3021
Should any person try to cover up this request or documents herein, BE YOU HEREBY PUT ON NOTICE: You may be indicted under USC Title 18 Sec. 3. 4, 2381, 2382, 2383, and 2384. Also, 4 U.S.C. & 101, federal law requires all state employees and officers take an oath of office and records kept of such administered oath.
CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO HOME PAGE
(or scroll down to view contacts)
Here’s the link where I got each Secretary of State’s fax numbers:
I also sent requests via email. Here are the email addresses I sent them to: (YOU CAN JUST COPY AND PASTE INTO YOUR BCC:)
MUCH MORE TO COME…
CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO HOME PAGE
(or just click on ASK THE ANIMALS header at top of each page)