• Proof Obama was BORN IN KENYA-See his fake birth certificate for yourself here…

Obama is scamming the entire country!

OBAMA WAS BORN IN KENYA!

[CLICK HERE] to see Obama’s fake Hawaiian birth certificate and compare for yourself (or just scroll down):

obama-birth-certificate

CLICK HERE TO SEE FORGED DOCUMENTS

proof

–noun

1.       evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.

One of the 3 REQUIREMENTS for becoming a US President IS you must be a natural born citizen (BORN on American soil), and Obama is in FACT NOT.  He was also holding dual citizenship at the time of his birth which also makes him ineligible.  Here’s the 4 major issues:

1).  OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE HE PROVIDED TO THE  AMERICAN PEOPLE WAS PROVEN TO BE A FRAUDULENT, PHOTOSHOP FAKE. This is the most substantial proof he was not born on American soil, because if he had a real birth certificate verifying he was born on American soil he would’ve provided one. This fact cannot be disputed and to this day never has been.

Only criminals and con artists create false identity documents.  Period.  End of story.  Producing a false birth certificate is a federal felony punishable by 20 years in prison.  See it for yourself:

[CLICK HERE TO EXAMINE THE DOCUMENTS & VIEW EXPERT REPORTS & VIDEOS–Dr. Ron Polarik PHd]

[CLICK HERE TO SEE A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY MOVIE TRAILER-THE FILM OBAMA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE]

[CLICK HERE TO SEE HOW EASY IT WAS FOR OBAMA’S CREW TO FORGE THE HAWAIIAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE IN 5 MINUTES – SEE HOW OBAMA’THEY DID IT HERE]

2).  PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DOCUMENTS ~ SECRETARY OF STATE & DNC DOCUMENTS PROVE OBAMA WAS NOMINATED BY THE DNC ILLEGALLY BECAUSE HIS BIRTHPLACE WAS NEVER VERIFIED, even though there was reasonable question to justify checking.  They either just sort of assumed the other guy checked it out – or – they didn’t bother to check at all.  But the fact remains that NO ONE CHECKED IT OUT BECAUSE HIS ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE HAD BEEN LOCKED IN A VAULT AND NO ONE in charge of the vetting process HAD EVER SEEN IT.
[VIEW SECRETARY OF STATE & DNC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DOCUMENTS]

[CLICK HERE TO SEE THE FRAUDULENT DNC PARTY “OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION OF NOMINATION” SIGNED BY NANCY PELOSI.

[CLICK HERE TO SEE OBAMA’S SIGNED SWORN PERJURIOUS STATEMENT SAYING HE’S A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN (State of Arizona, Declaration of Candiate)]

[CLICK HERE TO SEE another one of OBAMA’S SIGN SWORN PERJURIOUS STATEMENT HE MEETS QUALIFICATIONS (this one from the State of New Hampshire)]

3).  OBAMA WAS HOLDING DUAL CITIZENSHIP AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH (Obama’s father was Kenyan, Kenya was under British rule at the time of Obama’s birth).  Although Obama’s mother was American, the law states that in order for the child to be an American citizen, the mother would have had to be living in America at least 10 years AND with 5 OF THOSE YEARS THE MOTHER BEING OVER THE AGE OF 16.  Big problem there, Obama’s mom birthed Obama at the age of 18, WHICH IS 3 years short of the 5-year requirement.  THIS AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFIES HIM TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT, LET ALONE SERVE AS ONE.  This is also another fact that cannot be disputed and to this day never has been.

================================================

4).  OBAMA TRAVELED TO PAKISTAN in early June 1981 when PAKISTAN WAS ON THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT’S LIST OF BANNED COUNTRIES and marshal law was in effect there. Although not all travel to Pakistan was banned, but Americans were warned against of non-essential travel, and non-Muslims were not welcome unless they were on official business formalized through the embassy of the country of origin, and had to secure Visas in advance.  Since Obama had just arrived penniless in America and said he even slept on the street his first night, it is not probable nor reasonable to believe he  obtained a Visa and made the trip within the month.  Back in 1993 it took 4 weeks to get a Visa, but just imagine how long it would’ve taken 10 years before that.  In 1981 state office personnel were still using typewriters and dittos, not pc’s and copiers.  I know, I was a secretary during that time.

Conclusion:

“When Obama went to Pakistan he was traveling with either an Indonesian passport or a British passport.

If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, which was under Britsh rule at that time, and not in Hawaii as he claims.

And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would  prove he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967 because Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship.

It is impossible for Obama to have become a “natural born” American citizen between 1981 and 2008…over 20 years AFTER he was born…

in Kenya.

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America , as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.

If you care if Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Forward this!

obama_smoking YOUNG

==================================================

barackbama08usafrica

The Cloak of Absurdity

As of today not ONE media outlet [besides Joseph Farrah of World Net Daily] has had the courage or sense of duty to this country to take Obama to task on this or bring this FACT to the forefront. There are many reasons for this, but the main one being it sounds too unreal to be true, that Obama could perpetrate such a fraud in broad daylight?  Well, might I remind you that the best con jobs are done out in full view, especially when what is being perpetrated is so unlikely it appears absurd.  That’s con artistry 101.

Besides his real birth certificate, there’s also other documents and records Obama is hiding his very questionable SS Registration [SEE OBAMA’S FORGED SS REGISTRATION HERE], his college transcripts, his medical records, and his passport.

Obama is a crafty attorney and knows full well how to jump through loop holes.  The truth is that much of the American public bases their opinion on the merit of the legal cases brought against Obama by Berg, Keyes, and others, which unfortunately since nothing like this has ever happened in America before, there are no concrete laws in place regarding obtaining PROOF in the first place.  So it was trial and error, wrong jurisdiction, purposeful disinformation being spread by the Obama camp, such as the forged birth certificate, loop holes, and the cloak of absurdity all working against the people of the United States of America.

hawaiibirthcertificate1

Constitutional Crises

If American citizens are to comply with the laws of the land, the Constitution must be upheld.  If our  constitution is disregarded, then why follow the law at all?   I certainly will not.  And I denounce Obama and his illegal presidency.  He is not my president.  Would you go to war under the orders of a man who is not even legally the president?  An ursurper?

i WILL NOT.

Now about them loop holes…

Folks, it gets worse:

Obama secretly signs an Executive Order barring release of his Birth Certificate?

Posted by GoldenArm9 on Jul 19, 2009 15:53,
source: http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=235&pageNo=2

Here is an Executive Order that Obama signed back in January that seems is going to bar the release of his birth certificate. And this is what is says:“Sec.2Notice Of Intent To Disclose Presidential Records

Click here: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1712.pdf

===================================

loyaltyWhy does it matter where a President is born?

The founding fathers consisted of those who were both natural born citizens, and naturalized citizens, so they knew full well the meaning and difference between “natural born” and “naturalized.” They specifically and purposefully chose to use the term “natural born” for this very reason.  They wanted American presidents to be born on American soil, and not subjects nor ex-subjects of King George or naturalized citizens born in a foreign country.

My family was NOT BORN IN AMERICA (Italia) so I take this crime very SERIOUSLY;  if my father or any other of the millions of naturalized citizens born in other countries cannot legally run for president, why the heck can Obama???

Per the US Constitution, he cannot.

Therefore, anything Obama does operating under the capacity of  “president” is illegal, every speech he gives, every law and bill he signs, any order given to any soldier he calls to duty to give their life for this country is null and void.  And the folks that play along for whatever reason, whether out of ignorance or in full knowledge of the facts, are simply perpetrating the sham.

We should’ve listened to Alan Keyes:

Next time you’re listening to a so-called truth-show, consider this:  Don’t you think it’s a little absurd to  complain about ANYTHING Obama does without first taking him to task on the fact he is not even legally president in the first place?  I mean, what good does it do to gripe about Obama taking our right to bear arms away when we can easily prove he’s disqualified to be president and actually REMOVE that clown from office?

Are they hypocritical secret Obama-lovers?  Are they ignorant?  Cowards?  Or are they so obsessed with other issues they’re missing the forest for the trees?  Whatever it is WAKE THEM UP!  LET’S GET THAT IMPOSTOR OUT OF OFFICE.

obama-smoking

=========================

Constitutional Crises

Obama is not qualified to be president (not born on US soil).  So while the media is hiding…

Citizens are Taking Obama to Task!

Please pass this information around:

The following excerpt is from Sam Sewell, National Spokesperson for American Grand Jury ~

Our goal is to present indictments in every jurisdiction of the union:

Please take a moment to read this: This website has a specific purpose in mind.  AmericanGrandJury.org can HELP YOU if are looking to start, organize and manage a Citizen’s Grand Jury.

http://americangrandjury.org/

Even if the American Grand Jury were ignored, and deemed legally impotent, we can still expect a powerfully awakening increase in awareness and outrage on the part of the citizens.  There are many potencies beyond the legal system.  However, it is highly unlikely that not even one jurisdiction will take action on the indictment.  All we need is one jurisdiction to order “Discovery.”  The case against AKA OBAMA is unique because it will be over in the Discovery phase, as the first step in a criminal complaint.  The goal of the project I support is not to convict and punish AKA Obama but to discover what AKA OBAMA doesn’t want us to know, and why he doesn’t want us to know it.  Our goal will be achieved without a trial or a verdict.

Our goal is to present indictments in every jurisdiction of the union…: * 50 States,  3,007 entities named “County”

* 16 Boroughs in Alaska11 Census Areas in Alaska (areas not organized into Boroughs)

*64 Parishes in Louisiana

* 42 Independent Cities (1 in Maryland, 1 in Missouri, 1 in Nevada, and the remainder in Virginia)

* 1 District – the Federal District or District of Columbia.

For a total of 3,191 opportunities to bring criminal charges against offending politicians.

Even if an independently convened grand jury is mistakenly seen as merely people assembling to exercise their Constitutional right to “redress their grievances,” or report crimes, that is no small thing. Hundreds of people in such “assemblies” will be examining evidence and presenting the results of their investigation to appropriate county, state, and federal authorities, some of whom will almost certainly form more conventional grand juries to indict AKA OBAMA. Can one honestly surmise that there is not one prosecutor or judge in the entire nation who questions AKA OBAMA’s eligibility to be President?

Once the American Grand Jury presentments are made, it is likely that many prosecutors and judges will want a copy of the evidence.  [the original birth certificate]

The American Grand Jury organization with which I am affiliated is using recognized expert witnesses with a long professional history of forensic testimony.  The guiding principles for the project are the usual protocols of epistemology, scientific methodology, and rules of evidence.

Any prosecutor or judge who ignores such evidence and testimony is at risk of being seen as acquiescent.

An excellent article by international columnist Mark S. McGrew will help the reader to understand the Grand Jury story.

Rev. Sewell, an ordained Christian clergyman, a Pastoral Psychotherapist, a member of Mensa, a U.S. Navy Veteran, and a Member of the Association For Intelligence Officers.  He is a frequent commentator on religious and political issues.

Press Contact – Media only please:

Sam Sewell, National Spokesperson for http://americangrandjury.org/

email: writerpromo@comcast.net

Fax (239) 591-1987

Phone: Clinic Office – (239) 591-4565-

Ask for Dr. Sam

===============================

OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE CHURCH PRESENTATION [WATCH VIDEO]

OBAMA BIRTH DOCUMENT ANALYZED AND PROVEN TO BE A FRAUD [watch video]

ANOTHER EXPERT TESTIFIES OBAMA BIRTH DOCUMENT A FRAUD [watch video]


For the complete detailed written report by Dr. Ron Polark click here [Full detailed report here]

**********************************

SCROLL DOWN TO SEE OBAMA’S FAKE BIRTH DOCUMENT FOR YOURSELF – COMPARE WITH A REAL HAWAIIAN CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH!  AND SEE WHAT YET ANOTHER EXPERT WHO EXAMINED IT SAYS ~

CLICK BELOW FOR THE FAKE “CERTIFICATION” DOCUMENT OBAMA TRIED TO PAWN OFF AS A BIRTH CERTIFICATE” POSTED ON HIS WEBSITE: NOTICE IT SAYS “CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH “- NOT “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH” WHICH IS WHAT LEGAL BIRTH CERTIFICATES IN HAWAII SAY.

obama-birth-certificate1

OBAMA'S FAKE "CERTIFICATE." OBAMA'S "CERTIFICATION" OF BIRTH HE POSTED ON HIS WEBSITE (NOTE IT'S NOT A "CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH," IT'S SIMPLY A "CERTIFICATION OF BIRTH," BIG DIFFERENCE). BUT EVEN THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN TO BE A FORGERY.

NOW CLICK BELOW TO SEE WHAT A REAL HONOLULU BIRTH CERTIFICATE FROM A REAL US CITIZEN NAMED ALAN BORN SAME TIME AS OBAMA LOOKS LIKE AND YOU’LL SEE THE DIFFERENCE. NOTICE IT SAYS “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH” (not “certification” of birth like Obama’s says)

https://i0.wp.com/snarkybytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963.jpg

WHAT A REAL HAWAII CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH LOOKS LIKE

Obama’s Birth Certificate on his web-site and FactChech are forgeries. Here is proof.

A comparison of an actual LEGAL Birth certificate and scan results.

The Berg Lawsuit is factual and this proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.

The State of Hawaii considers a Certification of Live Birth is a secondary source of identification for the purpose of establishing Hawaiian ancestry; a Certificate of Live Birth is considered a primary source. To respond to challenges as to his eligibility for POTUS, BO first posted and then removed from his web site, a Certification of Live Birth, claiming this was his Birth Certificate. But such Certification is only issued when a birth certificate cannot be located in the records.

THERE IT IS, THE CERTIFICATION WAS ISSUED, BECAUSE THE RECORDS COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
Because they don’t exist.
Because he was not born in the State of Hawaii nor any other state on American Soil.

Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims
SOURCE: http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/video-democrat-lawyer-asks-obama-to-prove-he-is-a-natural-born-citizen/

ALSO,

HAWAII OFFICIALS REFUSE TO CONFIRM OBAMA HAWAII BIRTH

Despite the overbroad and erroneous claims of many news sources, Hawaii officials have NOT confirmed that Obama was born in Hawaii.  Read the 10/31/08 official Hawaii Dept. of Health press release. Again, at NO time do state officials confirm that Obama was actually born in Hawaii.

IN FACT, THE HAWAIIAN OFFICIALS REFUSED TO ANSWER WHETHER THE “ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH THEY HAVE ON FILE” IS ONE FROM KENYA OR HAWAII.  READ THE PRESS RELEASE. ABOVE.

WHAT CAN YOU DO?  AS A CITIZEN YOU CAN CONTRIBUTE $5 (the price of a pack of smokey-dokes, aka a pack of smokes for obama) and donate it to erect more billboards where the United States citizens can ask the question, since the media will not:

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

==================================================================

FACTS ON

BARACK OBAMA’S

HIDDEN BIRTH CERTIFICATE

==================================================================

JOURNALISTS:

[Validated Facts on Obama Eligibility Story]

Posted on July 19th, 2009 by AristotleTheHun and updated August 14, 2009
http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=2569

“I am a life time member of Mensa, so I am not stupid. Membership # 1061487

“The guiding principles for my professional research for articles and books I write are the usual protocols of epistemology, scientific methodology, and rules of logic and the rules of evidence.

“However, I am firmly convinced that AKA Obama is not eligible to be POTUS, and here is why:

“If you read the articles at the three links below, and review the citations at the embedded links, you will be “literate” about the facts of the “eligibility” story and will be able to inform the public objectively.”
http://www.thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html

=======================================================

Hawaii Birth Certificate – 1963
For discussion and more details go to:
http://snarkybytes.com/?p=521

AND THIS IS THE CLINCHER: SEE WHERE IT SAYS “AFRICAN” FOR FATHER’S RACE ON THE FAKE ONE?  WELL, BESIDES THE FACT THAT “AFRICAN” IS NOT A RACE [it’s a nationality, a person be any color or race and be African], THE TERM “AFRICAN AMERICAN” DID NOT COME ABOUT UNTIL THE LATE 1980’S, yet “African American” is still not a race [color].  Black Americans are Americans, not “Africans.” REGARDLESS, BACK IN 1961 “NEGRO” would’ve been the proper term for race the Hawaiian hospital would’ve used on birth certificates.

==========================================================

CLICK HERE TO SEE ANOTHER EXPERT REPORT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2032572/posts

AND HERE’S HIS CONCLUSION:  IT’S A FORGERY.

Obama is an attorney and knows the play on words confuses people and can be “legally true” at the same time being totally misleading to a false conclusion and he’s banking on that to keep things quiet and legally be telling the truth, while keeping the fact of where he was born secret. The Hawaiian officials know they are not required to have to say anything further at this time. They do hold his original certificate and that is all they will say– but they were careful not to say that the original certificate they hold is a “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH PROVING HE WAS ACTUALLY BORN IN A HOSPITAL IN THE STATE OF HAWAII,” and THAT is KEY.

FOLKS ARE GETTING ANGRY: LOOK AT THIS WOMAN AND THE SENIOR CITIZENS AT A RECENT TOWNHALL WITH MIKE CASTLE (R-DE) ASKED ABOUT THE OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE

VIDEO COURTESY OF OIL FOR IMIGRATION BLOG:
http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/

=================================================

See what others are saying:

WND DISCUSSION FORUM, REAL GOOD COOKIN’S HERE:

http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=235

***********************************

old stuff: (2008)

Right now the Supreme Court says Obama has until December 1, 2008 to provide a genuine certificate of live birth:

http://thevalleytruth.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/the-supreme-court-and-obamas-birth-certificate/

POLITICO reported people don’t want to bring this up because of fear of being called “racists?” AND the Governor of Hawaii won’t release whatever birth certificate they have on file BECAUSE OBAMA WON’T LET THEM [because a real Certification of LIVE Birth in the state of Hawaii doesn’t exist]. So far the Hawaiian officials will only verify they do in fact have his original birth certificate ON FILE and say it’s genuine.  Okay, sounds good on the surface, until you discover that could be ANY birth certification of record on file.  BECAUSE when they were specifically asked if it was an actual CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH IN THE STATE OF HAWAII – they REFUSED TO ANSWER or clarify that!    WHY?  BECAUSE THE ONE THEY HAVE ON FILE IS FROM KENYA!  THEY WERE VERY CAREFUL WITH THEIR CHOICE OF WORDS AND DID NOT VERIFY THE CERTIFICATE THEY CLAIM IS GENUINE IS IN FACT A “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH IN THE STATE OF HAWAII” (DOCUMENTING OBAMA’S ACTUAL “LIVE” BIRTH IN THE STATE OF HAWAII).  CLICK HERE TO SEE THEIR CAREFUL WORDING.

*

click here for more REASONS OBAMA IS LYING:

http://4hillary.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/the-fake-birth-certificate/

***********************************

FOR THEM TO SAY “THEY HOLD THE ORIGINAL GENUINE BIRTH CERTIFICATE” BASICALLY MEANS NOTHING WITHOUT THEM SAYING IT IS A “GENUINE CERTIFICATE OF LIFE BIRTH IN THE STATE OF HAWAII,” IT ONLY MEANS THEY HOLD A GENUINE BIRTH CERTIFICATE  (HIS ORIGINAL KENYA BIRTH CERTIFICATE WHICH WAS TRANSFERRED FOR RECORD PURPOSES WHEN HE WENT TO THE HOSPITAL FROM KENYA TO HAWAII AFTER HIS BIRTH IN KENYA).  WHY DID THEY  REFUSE TO SAY THEY HOLD A GENUINE “LIVE BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII!?” Because they do not have one.

So if you hear any reports that Obama’s CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH has already been proven – that is FALSE. Because so far all the officals have said is they “hold his original birth certificate there in Hawaii,” They will NOT say they hold a ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH IN the state of Hawaii because they don’t have one.

=====================================================

Former Democrat DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS A RECORDING OF OBAMA’S GRANDMOTHER IN KENYA STATING OBAMA WAS IN FACT BORN IN KENYA and is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. And this is one of the reasons Obama will not release his college transcripts and his FULL medical records.


WATCH VIDEO HERE: FEATURES DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/a_video_that_could_change_the_election/

LISTEN TO INTERVIEW WITH MICHAEL SAVAGE HERE:

http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/?pageId=2256

FOLKS, THE REASON OBAMA HAS NOT PROVIDED HIS REAL CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH (FROM HAWAII) IS BECAUSE HE DOESN’T HAVE ONE.  AND THE OFFICIALS IN HAWAII HAVE ONLY CONFIRMED THEY HOLD HIS ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE THERE IN HAWAII, THEY WERE VERY CAREFUL NOT TO SAY THE CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH THEY HAVE THERE IS FROM KENYA.

NICE TRY, BUT A BIG “F” FOR  F-A-I-L FOR OBAMA.

HE CAN’T PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH FOR HAWAII BECAUSE ONE DOESN’T EXIST.  BUT ONE DOES EXIST FROM KENYA AND THAT’S THE ONE THE HAWAIIAN OFFICIALS HAVE.

This DISQUALIFIES OBAMA AS PRESIDENT.

Obama’s scamming the entire country!

PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO A FRIEND (SINCE THE MEDIA IS NOT DOING THEIR JOB!)

WE REFUSE TO ACCEPT HIS PRESIDENCY ON THESE GROUNDS.  AND WILL NOT REFER TO HIM AS “PRESIDENT.”

*AMERICA IS WORTH FIGHTING FOR! *

The folks that are ignoring this very important issue are the same as the folks in that old classic story of the [emperor with no clothes on] from the creation of the lie to the implementation of it.  Which in the end took a simple observation from a child to expose.

There are many in-depth studies and articles written on this subject by very knowledgeable folks and they are to be commended.  But the investigative reports by those who proved Obama’s certification of birth was a forgery are most important.

Because truthfully, it’s real simple, all debates about this issue are answered in one obvious proven fact:  Obama would not have provided a forged birth certification if he had a legitimate certificate of live U.S. birth in the first place.  Because if he did, he would have provided it, but he did not, because he cannot, because he has not, because he WAS NOT born in America.

And before ANY argument can be waged, let alone won, the reason why Obama  presented a forged one must be addressed.  The fact that Obama provided a forged certification of birth to serve as his “proof” says it ALL.  Only liars and criminals use forged identity documents.  Period.  End of Story.

– A FIRST GENERATION BORN AMERICAN

*

*

Ref:

http://alligatorfarm.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/cajudgehearsobamacase/

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/stand-by-me/

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html

http://volokh.com/posts/1204265246.shtml

http://paralegalnm.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/barack-hussein-obama-a-natural-born-subject-of-great-britain/
8 USC 1409(c) regarding out-of-wedlock birth, re possible citizenship from mother (1961 version- the current one is revised and different)

http://theobamafile.com go to home page, on the left, click on TOF and choose the topic Natural Born

http://federalistblog.us natural born, subject to the jurisdiction
http://www.heritage.org Web Memo #925 2005 re Birthright citizenship. Natural born, 14th amendment

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/01/

http://colony14.net/id41.html – terrific detailed time line of Obama’s life

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com

http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/05/05/the-obama-birth-certificate/

*

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO HOME PAGE

(or just click on ASK THE ANIMALS header at top of each page)

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/httpmoniquemonicatwordpresscomobama-proof-he-was-born-in-kenya-fake-birth-certificate/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

56 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. MoniQue, don’t mind little eddie, he’s just like the rest of the obamabots who can’t defend this “Obamination” that he and millions of other DUPES just voted into office!! The only way they know how to respond to your (and OUR) legitimate questions about this guy is to spew hatred and vitriol at us. At least this idiot (and the milions who were stupid enough to vote for him!) will get to suffer with the rest of us when their “Messiah” takes office in January!!!

  2. I do not know the facts here, but this seems so odd.

    If he has a valid birth certificate showing birth in Hawaii then it should be required, period.

    You need your birth certificate for many reasons, even going on certain cruises, getting a copy of your social security card and I am sure multiple other reasons. it seems fundamental you need one to run for President.

    Obviously mandatory to take office.

    Obama, show us the proof and this is over.

  3. cant view the documents & details. why not?

    *********** MODERATOR RESPONSE ***********

    TRY CLICKING DIRECTLY:
    https://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/obama-proof-he-was-born-in-kenya-fake-birth-certificate/

    FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE:

    REAL HAWAIIAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE:

    I just viewed them all, perhaps you do not have enough memory to view the graphics, not sure, you could try rebooting and then try again.

    Other than that I do not know, but from my computer I can click on all the documents and they display on the page and also open

  4. This subject deals with the most basic qualifications to become the President of the United States of America and it is being ignored by almost everyone in the media. These are the same people that will still take issue with how much Palin’s wardrobe was but refuse to even discuss the possibility that we could be facing a most dangerous Constitutional Crisis. Anyone that would give the people in our media any credibility at all is beyond me. This needs to be resoved. NOW!

  5. […] • Proof Obama was BORN IN KENYA-See his fake birth certificate for yourself here… […]

  6. King George III’s Revenge: British-born Subject Barack Obama to become our next President in Defiance of the U.S. Constitution

    It is irrelevant if Barack Obama was born on U.S. soil or can even produce a birth certificate. He could have been born on the moon and he would still be a British-born citizen because his father was Kenyan…even Barack admits this about his father. This fraud should be apparent to anyone who is not an airhead!

    Karen and I adopted a girl from our State, who had lived in the streets. We got her when she was 6. Now to legally secure her we had to go before a judge. We had to have an attorney. We had to have proof with a genuine birth certificate when the judge awarded her to us and told us in the court room “LJS is now your inheritance”. We had to go through a very elaborate process legally to obtain a her name change to ours and had to have a real birth certificate to obtain adoption, her new social security number and her medicaid as she was deemed a hard to place child. So if this was all necessary to adopt a child and for me to get my Veteran’s Health Insurance Card, shouldn’t it also be required to become President of the U.S., so that we don’t end up with undocumented illegal alien as our President? So you have to ask yourself, are you ready to have a Muslim or Muslim Fundamentalist sympathizer in possession of the black briefcase, who will have access to the highest intelligence he could funnel off to terrorists, without anyone even knowing the source of the leak?

    I pray that all of you will help do everything in your power to stop this act of treason!

    Sincerely,

    James Sundquist
    Director
    Rock Salt Publishing
    http://rock-to-salt.cephasministry.com/

  7. Obama has released a valid and verified Birth Certificate. It meets the standards set forth by the State Department. He was born in Hawaii. There is no proof anywhere that it is a forged document.

    The argument on dual citizenship is very weak. The Constitution says nothing about it at all. The only pertinent question at hand is how his citizenship was conferred, by birth or by statute? Donofrio is making a loopy argument that since Obama was born with dual citizenship that his US citizenship was conferred by statute and not by birth. Keep in mind, this is HIS POSITION and not supported by the Constitution or any previous case law anywhere. So all of you who are citing his arguments as “proof” or “evidence” of anything are jumping the gun to say the least.

    If you believe that his dual citizenship at birth makes him ineligible, than you must believe that British Law trumps US Law when it comes to our own citizenship. The premise that British Citizenship Laws have any bearing on US Citizenship Laws or our Constitution is absurd. Only US Law is relevant. Think about it: Britain, France, or any other country for that matter, could pass a law tomorrow that would give citizenship to every person born in the US. (There is nothing we could do to stop it.) As a result of such a law, every person born in the US would automatically have dual citizenship at birth. As such, following the logic of Donofrio’s case, no one born in the US would be a Natural Born Citizen and NO ONE would be eligible to be POTUS. Does that make sense? The British law conferring Obama’s British citizenship by right of blood is irrelevant to US Law which conferred his US citizenship by right of birth.

    The questions is simple, if he’s natural born he’s eligible. ALL of the EVIDENCE says he’s a natural born citizen of the US. The supreme court will throw out Donofrio’s case on lack of merit and Obama will be confirmed. This is not a constitutional crisis. It’s simply a small time lawsuit by a hack lawyer looking for attention and making lots of noise. Look at who Donofrio is, and maybe you’ll understand why nobody is paying attention what he’s saying. ANYONE can file a lawsuit.

    *******MODERATOR’S COMMENT*************
    Obama’s birth certificate he posted on his website has been proven by all experts who’ve examined it to be a photoshop forgery. There is only one reason Obama would submit a forged birth certification: because he does not have a legitimate one they can show the public.

    That’s the point: there is NO EVIDENCE THAT OBAMA WAS BORN ON U.S. SOIL, except a forged certification of birth supplied by Obama, and a press conference where the Hawaiian officials refused to say if the certificate of live birth they hold “on file” in Hawaii is a Kenyan one or a Hawaiian one. But reason dictates that if it were a Hawaiian one, they would’ve answered and qualified that, but they did NOT.

    As far as you pointing to Donofrio personally in a negative way, just to divert attention from the fact that Obama posted a forged birth certificate on his website and factcheck, IS WEAK.

    Apathy is the antithesis to hope and it shall not damper spirits on this blog. Truth needs no validation from an earthly court in the first place. Jesus Himself was condemned by both courts, Jewish and Roman. There is nothing wrong or misguided about Donofrio’s case. However, there are problems with people who judge a case based on the person bringing it. That is prejudicial and a case should be decided on its merits. I said “should,” not “would.”

    REMEMBER OJ SIMPSON?

    He won his case. But he was not “innocent.”

    So winning a case does not mean everything and if Donofrio’s case doesn’t get heard it certainly would not mean Obama did not forge his certification document. And it won’t mean that Obama is a qualified natural born U.S. citizen either.

    We are not responsible if people will listen or if the case will be won or not, but we are responsible for delivering the message. [Ezekiel 2 & 3]

  8. LEO DONOFRIO COMMENTS ON JUDAH BENJAMIN ARTICLE CONCERNING NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AND THE COMMON LAW

    On November 28, 2008, Judah Benjamin published an article at the Texas Darlin blog http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/natural-born-citizens-or-how-to-beat-a-subject-to-death-with-a-stick/ which discussed my case and the natural born citizen issue. While I enjoyed reading this article, and I agree with the conclusion – that Obama is not eligible – I disagree with the basis upon which that conclusion was made.

    Specifically, I disagree that the common law is controlling on the issue of “natural born citizen”. It is “national law” which is controlling. I don’t know if Mr. Benjamin is a lawyer, but his reading, explanation and understanding of the natural born citizen issue is not exactly on point.

    I do agree with Benjamin’s conclusion, that Obama is not a natural born citizen, but for the wrong reasons.

    And I did enjoy Judah’s article above. He has obviously done much research. But there is a glaring mistake in his logic where he fails to point out the necessary concept in common law definition of “natural born subject”.

    There are two mistakes in his article which need to be addressed.

    FIRST MISTAKE: Failure to state cited law was repealed.

    Judah mentions the 1790 naturalization act as follows:

    “In the United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) it says:

    ‘the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens’.”

    Unfortunately, Benjamin fails to mention, as do many others, that this act was specifically repealed in 1795 and replaced with the same exact clause as written above EXCEPT the words “natural born” have been deleted leaving only the word “citizens”.

    See Section 3 Naturalization Act of 1795

    This leads to the second point of error.

    SECOND MISTAKE: Failure to properly analyze common law.

    Congress having repealed the”natural born provision” leads to the core problem in Mr. Benjamin’s analysis. Naturalization only concerns people who were, “at birth” not US citizens.

    People born in other countries as citizens of foreign powers, but who immigrate to the USA are naturalized. Naturalization has nothing to do with citizens like McCain who are born abroad to American citizens and are US Citizens by statute “at birth”.

    Naturalization also could not cover Obama who was (we assume) born on United States soil (Hawaii).

    But at the common law, naturalized citizens WERE considered to be “NATURAL BORN SUBJECTS”. At the common law, the act of naturalization returns them to birth and they are effectively reborn to the allegiance of the King.

    The best case which explains this concept is “United States vs. Rhodes” which Mr. Benjamin does quote but fails to mention the case citation, which is always important because it provides the reader the chance to see the context of the quote discussed. And this is very important. Here is what Benjamin quoted from Justice Swayne’s eloquent opinion:

    “Justice Noah Haynes Swayne was around when they wrote the XIVth Amendment and the Equal Rights Act of 1866 and in 1866 he said this:

    ‘All persons born in the Allegiance of the King are Natural- Born Subjects, and all persons born in the Allegiance of the United States are Natural-Born Citizens. Birth and Allegiance go together. Such is the Rule of the Common Law, and it is the Common Law of this country…since as before the Revolution.’ “

    And this appears to back Mr. Benjamin’s core thesis, that Obama is not a natural born citizen under the common law definition thereof, which may be true, but that in itself is NOT the main reason Obama isn’t eligible. The common law is not our national law. Our national law is the Constitution. We do not follow the common law, we follow the Constitution.

    And this is important to note because the common law, which may also bear out that Obama isn’t eligible, at the same time provides Obama with his best argument that he is eligible. The reason for this lies on that part of Justice Swayne’s opinion which Mr. Benjamin did not quote. Here is Justice Swayne’s relevant quote:

    “An alien naturalized is “to all intents and purposes a natural born subject.” Co. Litt. 129. “Naturalization takes effect from birth; denization from the date of the patent.” Vin. Abr. tit. “Alien,” D. …The power is applicable only to those of foreign birth. Alienage is an indispensable element in the process. To make one of domestic birth a citizen is not naturalization, and cannot be brought within the exercise of that power. There is a universal agreement of opinion upon this subject. [**26] Scott v. Sanford, 19 How. [60 U.S.] 578; 2 Story, Const. 44.

    United States v. Rhodes, 27 F. Cas. 785, at 790 (1866)

    The status of the candidate “at birth” is relevant to Article 2, Section 1. For somebody to be a “natural born citizen” and therefore eligible to be President, they must have the status “at birth”.

    If the common law were applied in the USA, then all naturalized citizens would be eligible to be President since the common law understanding was that, as quoted by Swayne, “Naturalization takes effect from birth”. If we followed that today, then all naturalized citizens would be returned to birth to be reborn and could therefore claim “natural born citizen” status.

    Mr. Benjamin correctly points out that naturalized citizens like Arnold Schwarzenegger can NOT be President since they are naturalized and the US doesn’t recognize those persons as “natural born citizens”.

    But Mr. Benjamin also argues that this idea comes from the common law and he is wrong about that. The common law holds that Arnold Schwarzenegger, having been naturalized, would have been a “natural born subject”. And if we then apply the common law concept and understanding of “natural born subject” to “natural born citizen” then Arnold Schwarzenegger would be eligible to be President since, at common law, his birth status could change upon naturalization.

    But Arnold Schwarzenegger is not eligible to be President because the United States doesn’t follow common law. The United States follows national law, and our national law is the CONSTITUTION.

    Obama was not naturalized, and I do not make the argument above to say that naturalization laws apply to Obama – although they might if he were not born in Hawaii- but let’s assume he was. I make the argument above to show that the United States is not following common law and the Constitution will not be interpreted as if it were controlled by common law. There is enough evidence in our history and other laws to bear this out.

    The first of which is precedent. In our history as a nation, every President we have ever had was born in the United States to parents who were both US Citizens.

    And it’s very important, especially in light of Justice Scalia’s very recent comments to the Federalist Society of November 22, 2008 wherein he said that the common law is dead and does not control in the USA:

    “The common law is gone. The federal courts never applied the common law and even in the state courts it’s codified now.”

    You might want to hear Justice Scalia’s entire presentation:

    http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1193/pub_detail.asp

    Furthermore, it is very clear that the those who wrote the 14th Amendment believed that only those so qualified as all previous Presidents were eligible to be President under Article 2, section 1, Clause 5. This was made clear by Madison’s article:

    “Why U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark Can Never Be Considered Settled Birthright Law” Dec 10, 2006

    “John A. Bingham, chief architect of the 14th Amendments first section, considered the proposed national law on citizenship as “simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…” If this law was simply to reaffirm the common law doctrine then the condition of the parents would be totally irrelevant.”

    Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, must also be read in light of the 14th Amendment which is just as much a part of the Constitution as any other part.

    CONCLUSION

    All in all, Mr. Benjamin has made a valiant attempt to provide a clear analysis of the natural born citizen topic. Please do not assume I am bashing him. I respect his passion and research, but it’s not entirely accurate. And considering what Scalia just said to the Federalist Society about the common law being gone (only three days after my case was scheduled for conference), it’s important to keep things in their proper historical perspective.

    Leo C. Donofrio
    SEE ARTICLE HERE:
    http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=407

  9. To The Moderator:

    You might want to have a closer look at what constitutes “proof” and what “evidence” actually is and how to evaluate it. I’ve seen all the self-proclaimed “experts” and their analysis of the the scanned version of the document. Not ONE of them has handled the actual document, therefore their subsequent analyses can not be considered proof of anything other than their opinion.

    Have you ever heard of Ockham’s Razor?

    Do you really think that the State of Hawaii would lie about this and put forward a fake Birth Certificate? Where is your EVIDENCE of that? Not speculation, not supposition, but EVIDENCE? There isn’t any.

    It’s amazing really. The Birth Certificate meets the standards set forth by the State Department, has been analyzed and photographed from every conceivable angle, has been positively confirmed by the State of Hawaii as valid confirmation of his birth in Hawaii, and you still say there is no evidence he was born in the US. In fact, ALL of the EVIDENCE says he was. Everything else is flimsy self-referential supposition by bloggers and self-proclaimed experts examining a scanned document they pulled off a website. Look at it objectively and evaluate what you are seeing. Ockham’s Razor! …Look into it.

    I never said there was anything wrong with Donofrio filing his case. He has every right to do so. But it doesn’t mean that it has any merit. The SCOTUS will determine if it does. His logic is very weak in my opinion. If you believe his logic to be correct, than there are consequences that follow. What happens if Country X passes a law granting retroactive Dual Citizenship from birth to all people born in the US?

    Also, what do you believe to be the Truth here? You seem to be purporting two mutually exclusive theories as to why Obama is not eligible. On the one hand you say he was born in Kenya and on the other you support Donofrio’s supposition, which acknowledges Obama’s birth in Hawaii. (Donofrio himself admits that Obama is under no obligation to release his “vault” certificate.) So which is it?

  10. To say that American main stream media has failed to report what is “the story of the century” is an UNDERSTATEMENT. Their cover-up is treasonous. In the event the Supreme Court ultimately determines that Obama cannot be President — not qualifying as an Article II “natural born citizen” — the msm will be the blame for any civil unrest by failing to prepare the American public.

    Watch this — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQnL2IwyUAs

  11. There is precedence in this case from a case in 1866 United States vs. Rhodes Case No. 16,151. This means that a natural born citizen has to be born in the US and both parents must be US citizens, otherwise the child would have dual citizenship and would be subject to a foreign power.

    United States vs. Rhodes Case No. 16,151

    “That all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery,”

    Explanation from John C. Eastman, Ph.D:

    The “subject to the jurisdiction” provision must therefore require something in addition to mere birth on U.S. soil. The language of the 1866 Civil Rights Act, from which the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was derived, provides the key to its meaning. The 1866 Act provides: “All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.”[3] As this formulation makes clear, any child born on U.S. soil to parents who were temporary visitors to this country and who, as a result of the foreign citizenship of the child’s par­ents, remained a citizen or subject of the parents’ home country was not entitled to claim the birth­right citizenship provided by the 1866 Act.

  12. My fear is that SCOTUS will rule to allow Obama to stay even though he is not eligible. This would make it a precedent that someone who is not a natural born citizen can be president.

    Please sign this petition!

    http://www.rallycongress.com/concerned-americans/

  13. USC Title 8 Sec. 1401. Nationals and Citizens of United States at Birth

    The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United
    States at birth:
    (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the
    jurisdiction thereof;

    ************** MODERATOR’S COMMENT **************
    Yes, exactly. And Barack Obama was not born in the United States.

    I think you need to reread your quote above again, it only pertains to those BORN IN AMERICA, as defined in “a) a person born in the United States AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

    It doesn’t say “OR” subject to the jurisdiction thereof, it says “AND.”

    Natural by definition is not something acquired. Obama acquired his citizenship, but he was not born on American soil so he is not a natural born citizen.

  14. Moderator,

    You obviously have a problem evaluating claims and evidence. If you’re going to blog you might want to consider shouldering up your rational skill set just a bit. Even my pet bird can distinguish a real bird from a false image in the mirror. You seem to be stuck in a hall of mirrors. Best of luck finding your way out.

    ******MODERATOR’S RESPONSE***

    The only “obvious” thing here is you cannot answer why Obama would post a fake Photoshop certification of birth on his website if he in fact had a legitimate one.

    Best not to use animal analogies if you don’t know how to use them. Best not to mix them with abstract conclusions like your “hall of mirrors,” as they just become nonsensical.

    Obama is adept at smoke and mirrors. And rather than face the fact you’re caught up in his never-never-land, you’d rather try to project your hall of mirrors on me. And you will not find your way out until you learn to love and seek the truth.

    Proverbs 26:9
    9 Like a thornbush in a drunkard’s hand
    is a proverb in the mouth of a fool.

  15. The answer is that he did not post a fake document as ALL of the EVIDENCE indicates. My point to you is that you have convinced yourself of a narrative which you can not seem to see beyond. The evidence pointing to his birth in Hawaii is overwhelming. It’s astounding that you can just ignore it. You are grasping at straws, at ANYTHING to discredit Obama. Then you call yourself a seeker of the truth. It’s really sad to see. Anyway, I’m done with your site and won’t be back. Best of luck.

  16. This is a great site and all true. Obama is a counterfeit, and be sure his sin will find him out. Numbers 32:23 IMO Obama will prove to be the biggest con in the history of our country. Obama is all about Obama, he will self destruct and will reap what he has sown, big time. Can’t wait for his demise, because it’s coming. God laughs at the wicked, knowing their day is coming. I laugh as well, and we will get the last laugh on Obama and pals. Good enough. If he wasn’t a fraud, and Obama won the election by fraud he would allow people to see his vault version of his BC, what a liar Obama is and the truth will be told. I’m glad for the cloud of deceit to be over him always. I have no feeling for this Obamanation and will never pray for him, as I don’t pray for the devil, so to devil with Obama & The Washington DC fat cats. All devilish.

  17. Show me the MICROFILM and who was the doctor(or the witness) that delivered and signed the birth certificate.

    Whats taking so long to come up with the info- the American people deserve to know.
    Just produce it and all this will be over.

  18. Like most reactionary echo chambers, you delete intelligent responses that disagree. You are a political coward. If your assertions cannot even stand up to contrary posts in a blog, they have no merit whatsoever.

    THIS IS WHY YOU, AND YOUR ILK, ARE VIEWED AS NUTS.

    Merry Christmas. President Obama will be such an improvement over Fuhrer Bush, your silly nonsense will shine as just more hate speech, wrapped in the GOP flag…

    ****MODERATOR’S COMMENT****
    I am not sure which message you are referring to that was deleted and I don’t recall any previous messages from “Dr. Ian Agni.” I usually do not delete messages. I have no idea what post you’re referring to, please repost it.

    As for GOP? I am an independent, and used to be a screaming left wing liberal [far more left than you] before I saw the light and saw how they use [and lie to] passionate folks like me. In fact, I was one of the main columnists for an ultra left magazine in Hollywood for 7 years, just to name one example. I do not have a “category,” except the ones folks like you apparently like to keep others in. I am an artist though so the “nuts” label is something many artists hear from closed minded individuals on both sides of the political spectrum, so much that it is blase. And although I do post Republican links on this blog [mainly because they are PRO LIFE], that does not mean I am a “Republican.” In fact, I have many problems with the Republican party, or any “party” for that matter. I like to listen to both sides. There are liberal links on my blog, however, such as the Clinton supporter links. But the reason I will not list more liberal links is they will not acknowledge God, our creator, and most promote sodomy which as my animal blog states, even animals not better not to do. The other seriously wrong error they promote is murdering human babies for birth control. Another thing even animals do not do.

    As for “coward?” Unresolved argument, until you provide the post you say I deleted.

    If one can go outside the box and truly do some objective comparisons, one would see how very comparable Obama is to Hitler. Try propaganda and crowd worship first. Bush, the bumpkin is hardly comparable, although there were some in the administration that used propaganda in the shock and awe war promotions. But across the board, not even close to the level Obama has taken it.

    I have no desire, time or intention of going back and forth on this. So repost your post or the post in question or don’t and yes, MERRY CHRISTMAS! In fact, the song “OH HOLY NIGHT” would be a good song to listen to before you write your next one, will take the hateful name calling “you,” etc., and arrogant edge out of any post.

  19. REPLY

    FACTS

    In 2003, 3 African nations, Ghana, s. Africa, and Botswana participated in TIMSS physics. The average score for the 5,150 students in Botswana who took the test was 443, seven of whom scored over 505, and none of whom scored over 549. The average score for the 8,952 students in South Africa who took the test was 244, thirteen of whom scored over 447, and none of whom scored over 514. So also in Ghana, where the average score for their 5,100 students was 239, seven of whom scored over 427, and none of whom scored over 514.

    Conversely, the average score for the 6,018 students in Singapore was 579, eight of whom scored lower than 462, and none of whom scored lower than 423. At best we can say that eight students in Singapore MAY have scored lower than SEVERAL of the thirteen highest scoring students in South Africa and SEVERAL of the seven highest scoring students in Ghana. No student in Singapore scored 4 standard deviations higher than their mean, or 735, much less 5 standard deviations higher, at 774.

    So needless to say, no student in Botswana, South Africa, nor Ghana ever scored four standard deviations higher, or 549, 514, or 489, respectively, either, much less five standard deviations higher, or 593, 581, or 551 respectively. Such scores are in the range of the average for Taipei and Korea, whose IQs are in the range of 105 IQ points. It simply boggles the imagination for us to be expected to believe that Obama was the ONE Kenyan in the entire world who scored not just one but TWO standard deviations higher than a place where NO Ghanan, Botswanan, or South African has ever ventured. To claim that his IQ is 132 IQ points, yet another three standard deviations higher than the impossible, is the height of absurdity. It would make Obama more valuable as a Wringly Brothers’ Circus freak than a six legged elephant. Yet that’s exactly the claim that his presidential campaign made and you should be embarrassed to the hilt to see so many of your fellow countrymen fall for this circus act.

    The average IQ of Kenya is 71 IQ points, the same as for Ghana, and 1 point lower than both Botswana and South Africa, at 72 IQ points. Out of 38 million Kenyans, do you know how many score more than 5 standard deviations higher than that? Only 11 do, at an IQ of only 96 IQ points, four standard deviations higher than their mean, and NONE have an IQ higher than 101 IQ points, five standard deviations higher than the mean. Obama’s not even a Kenyan. He’s a mixed breed and most mixed breeds of most species are of lower quality and intelligence than the pure breeds (otherwise why don’t mules race in horse races)?

    California voters consider affirmative action to be CHEATING, which is why we outlawed it with Proposition 209 which actually amended the state constitution for the express purpose of KILLING it. Obama is clearly left over from those days.

    Why not simply require him to take the normal IQ test which any dog catcher in the country has to take in order to qualify for his job?

    You can bet that this would settle the matter once and for all.

    Correction, Tues. Dec. 23, 2008: 7% of the population of Botswana are Whites who score similar to their brethren back in England at 545, meaning that the 93% who’re blacks scored 358. Only seven black students from Botswana scored over 456 and none of them scored over 514. Therefore, none of the lowest scoring eight students in Singapore who scored lower than 462 are likely to have scored lower than the seven top scoring black students from Botswana, meaning there was no overlap of test scores between Singapore and Botswana.

  20. Obama is really dumb. Sure. Like W.

    The President graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1991; He was the first African-American president of the Law Review, being elected out of 18 candidates.

    Loeb University Professor Laurence Tribe, who taught Obama and employed him as a research assistant, remembers him as a “brilliant, personable, and obviously unique” person. Tribe said that Obama’s theoretical perspective on applying modern physics to law was “very impressive.”

    “He is obviously a serious intellectual as well as a fantastic campaigner who can reach across boundaries,” Tribe said. “He will make an extraordinarily fine president.”

  21. nice information

  22. Thus far 35 courts have had proceedings – 35 courts have rejected the case. In one recent one the Fed judge went onto require the plaintiff lawyer to provide the court with an explation as to why the court should not FINE the lawyer for presenting such a poor case and wasting the time and money of the court.
    FOUR cases were rejected by the Supreme Court – FOUR.
    You see this is an internet delusion.

  23. Whether the court agrees to hear the case or not does not have any bearing on whether or not it is true or just. There were plenty of courts around in Hitler’s day, were they just? What about the courts in the deep south that condemned men and women to death on account of the color of their skin?

    Now, if it was the court of God who deemed it unworthy then you’d have a valid point. But let’s look at our Supreme Court, they also failed to render a majority vote in regards to stopping the advocating the murder of millions of babies in the womb and have also discounted many cases that came up before them regarding that as well. And for the record, it was not all of the judges who deemed those Obama cases as not having merit. It required a majority which it failed to get. And the fact that there were judges who did agree with the folks who brought the cases against Obama illustrates that point: judgment is judgment, which is opinion, not fact, and not necessarily just.

  24. […] Obama doesn’t even meet the basic ELIGIBILITY requirements to BE president (not a natural US born citizen). It’s not a small matter of him not providing a real US birth certificate when asked by the American people, it’s that HE DOESN’T HAVE ONE TO BEGiN WITH because he was BORN IN KENYA. […]

  25. THANK YOU BOB B. FOR POINTING THIS OUT!!!

    YES, WHERE ARE ALL THE TRUTH-RADIO COMMENTATORS ON THIS?

    **********************************************
    bob b Reply:
    July 18th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    READ IT!!!! It says “certificate of Live Birth” Whether it is real or forged it isn’t a birth certificate. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE has more info. than this, such as — what hospital the child was born in ? —- the name of the dr. who delivered the baby? People should protest to get this investigated by a neutral organization. The highest office in America and you don’t have to prove you are qualified for the position? Just show the birth certificate obama and your problems are over. If he can get away with not showing it he proves that Americans are the biggest bunch of assholes on the planet. Last week Major Stefan Cook refused to be deployed to the middle east because he couldn’t prove obama was legitimatley commander in chief. It was supposed to go to court last thursday — lo and behold on wednesday the order to deploy was revoked!!! Nobody has the balls to cover this story –not Hannity, not Beck and NOT even alex jones. Personally I think it either means they are all NWO shills or are ball less or are getting great amounts of pressure to shut up about it!!!

    http://www.infowars.com/feds-declare-tennessee-gun-law-invalid/

  26. HERE’S A RIDDLE FOR YOU…

    What passport did Obama use in 1981?

    SOURCE: http://www.hotstockmarket.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2080988

    Paul Hollrah over at UTFSM believes the issue about Obama’s birth certificate can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question:

    What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi ?

    So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with
    the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?

    And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta, and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through
    Customs and Immigration?

    The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama’s citizenship a rather short and simple one.

    Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
    A : Yes, by his own admission..

    Q: What passport did he travel under?
    A: There are only three possibilities
    1981
    1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,
    2) He traveled with a British passport, or
    3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.

    Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S.
    Passport in 1981?
    A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.*

    Conclusion:
    When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport..

    If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.

    And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

    MODERATOR NOTE:

    * Although not all travel to Pakistan was banned, but Americans were warned against of non-essential travel, and non-Muslims were not welcome unless they were on official business formalized through the embassy of the country of origin, and had to secure Visas in advance. Since Obama had just arrived penniless in America and said he even slept on the street his first night, it is not probable nor reasonable to believe he obtained a Visa and made the trip within the month. Back in 1993 it took 4 weeks to get a Visa, but just imagine how long it would’ve taken 10 years before that. In 1981 state office personnel were still using typewriters and dittos, not pc’s and copiers. I know, I was a secretary during that time.

    Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a “natural born” American citizen between
    1981 and 2008..

    If you care if Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Pass this on.

    http://obamadocuments.wordpress.com/

  27. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S.
    Passport in 1981?
    A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    rotflmao . . . how many times does this nonsense have to be debunked

    Travel Advisory from the State Department, dated Aug. 17, 1981
    “BEFORE TRAVELING TO PAKISTAN, AMERICANS SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING UPDATED VISA REQUIREMENTS: 30 DAY VISAS ARE AVAILABLE . . . .”

    http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/travel/cis/southasia/TA_Pakistan1981.pdf

    Now what part of that looks like “no travel” to you?

    *********** MODERATOR’S RESPONSE *****************
    In this case, none, because you only read my quote I posted as a comment from a post by Paul Hollrah and you did not read the qualifying paragraph in my actual post #4 above that specifically addresses that. But thanks for pointing that out because I now have the qualifier in that comment section too:

    “4). OBAMA TRAVELED TO PAKISTAN in early June 1981 when PAKISTAN WAS ON THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT’S LIST OF BANNED COUNTRIES and marshal law was in effect there. Although not all travel to Pakistan was banned, but Americans were warned against of non-essential travel, and non-Muslims were not welcome unless they were on official business formalized through the embassy of the country of origin, and had to secure Visas in advance. Since Obama had just arrived penniless in America and said he even slept on the street his first night, it is not probable nor reasonable to believe he obtained a Visa and made the trip within the month. Back in 1993 it took 4 weeks to get a Visa, but just imagine how long it would’ve taken 10 years before that. In 1981 state office personnel were still using typewriters and dittos, not pc’s and copiers. I know, I was a secretary during that time.”

    So I will ask you your same question: Now what part of that looks like “no travel” to you?

    Regardless, the simple ugly fact remains: When the American people requested proof Obama qualified for the presidency as being a natural born citizen (born on American soil), he provided a forged birth document.

    Only criminals and con artists use fraudulent identity documents.

    ********************************************

  28. Thanks so much for including my research in your extensive coverage of this issue.

    I recently updated and revised my hugely popular “OMG” article that has been reposted on more than 100 web sites and published by Intellectual Conservative.

    The full spectrum of evidence that can be used by Citizen Grand Juries to get rid of AKA Obama is contained in the 6816 carefully researched words.

    Instructions on how to successfully convene Citizens Grand Juries are also included.

    “For nothing is hid that shall not be made manifest, nor anything secret that shall not be known and come to light.” Luke 8:17

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html

    Sam Sewell
    (Aristotle the Hun)

  29. How sad you people are trying to prove Obama is from Kenya. Secret Democratic Central Committe documents prove he is not of this Earth and arrived in a time machine from the first Tuesday of next month.

    So give it up. You’re just embarrassing yourselves with this “Kenya” stuff. Kenya is not even a real place. Try to get your facts straight, OK?

  30. lol.. idiots..

  31. […] Which by the way, makes every bill Obama signs, every speech he gives, every order his office hands down to soldiers, and EVERYTHING he DOES acting as president, iLLEGAL, null and void. And pretty much means if we let this go on we are breaking the law right along with him. [see proof here] […]

  32. ***PATRIOTS TALK ONLY ABOUT OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE***
    The Liar has been called Liar!and now must be exposed as an Usurper and sent to jail.

    Government Treasonous Media, Commie Congress and Saudi money(Saudis own most US Media) has a Blackout on Obama’s BC.
    Fake Conservative talk show hosts refuse to touch it.(O’Reilly bad mouthed Birthers and now IS A suspect of supporting Obamacare, Beware!)
    Defeat them, talk about it!
    The Usurper and Saudi money wants you to talk about HealthCare, racism, bailouts, tarp, clunckers, football, etc anything except Obama’s Birth Certificate.
    Why?
    –He has no defense there. He can’t produce it because He doesn’t have it.
    So?
    –Talk only about OBAMA PRODUCING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE NOW!
    –Demand He produce it or quit!
    –Talk about impeaching the Usurper.
    –Expose his LIES! But Mainly talk about his Birth Certificate.
    Show everyone his Kenyan Birth Certificate here the link:
    http://freedomtalk.lefora.com/2009/09/07/here-is-the-original-obamas-kenyan-birth-certifica/page1/

  33. ***THE AUDACITY OF THE USURPER***

    We know that Obama traveled on an Indonesian passport as late as 1982, and we know that Axelrod’s company hacked the passport records and sealed them.
    Obama knows how to make explosives and He learned in Pakistan how to kill his political enemies.

    Why an Indonesian terror suspect is President of the United States?

    And yet NOBODY will hold him to the Constitutional qualification of being a natural born citizen.

    All Africa and Europe know Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya. Here proof this man is an Usurper:
    http://freedomtalk.lefora.com/2009/09/07/here-is-the-original-obamas-kenyan-birth-certifica/page1/

  34. I continue to write on TOPIX about this matter and have linked hundreds of related articles on my Facebook account. Obama is a traitor and a fraud. He is a degenerate,criminal miscreant usurper. It is our sacred DUTY to defend America from domestic and foreign enemies. Obama is a domestic enemy. he should be in Jail at the least. According to US law,the penalty for treason is Death. See 18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,sec.2381. Obama is a radical islamist supremacist wannabe world dictator.

  35. Robert,

    Keep praying and speaking out with your passion and anguish over lawlessness; God hears you and so do I and millions of others in America. Please send us your link to your site or Facebook so we can post in the Obama section.

    Remember: Ezekiel 3: we are not responsible if they listen or they do not listen and God says they will not listen, but we ARE responsible for delivering the message. You are delivering the message and that is a GOOD THING. Please send the link when you can.

  36. Formal criminal complaint filed by me on November 25,2009 with Kathleen Mehltretter,Acting US Attorney,Western District of NY upon the charges against Obama and Pelosi for Treason and Election fraud.

  37. мне понравилось очень, спесибо))

  38. Let me try again:

    Obama: Deceiver, Cheat, Swindler, Liar, Fraudster, Con Artist
    http://newsfromrussia.com/world/americas/08-01-2009/106908-obama-0

    **************MODERATOR COMMENT************
    Wow Robert, thanks.

    I concur wholeheartedly.

  39. thats true but god wants him there if he put him there so you cant argue with that and trie and tell that to the goverment there stubern they wont listen ive sent emails to them all the time and ive got and email that said we’ll get back to you in 3 days and ive got in nothing asept w’ll get back to you in 3 days it will be 3 days and the’ll send me another email we’ll get back to you in 3 days so im on your side its fake

  40. Does it really matter where the President is born, so long as he serves the will and interests of the average American, and, to a lesser extent, world citizen. And as far as I can see, that is exactly what Obama is doing.

  41. Yes.It “really matter[s]”. The Natural-born” requirement was placed there for a reason. So that our POTUS would be loyal to no one else but the USA. We are NOT in charge of the “World” and are not “world citizen[s}” WE are Americans.Obama does NOT serve the “will and interests of the average American”. The average american is NOT communist,socialist OR radically islamic. The average citizen is NOT out to overthrow the US government as the traitor and fraud Obama is:
    http://americangrandjury.org/public/

  42. you are a damn fool. Obama was born in AMERICA and dinosaurs were around MILLIONS of years ago. you can disagree with obama but do you have to make things up?

  43. Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock: A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) INA provided the citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child’s birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.

  44. Obama: Calls himself an African American. What about his white mother? He has a chance to unite both black and white by stating I am an American. Actually he would have been so black, if it were not for his mother? Would He even been elected?. I do not go around saying I am an Irish Indian American. I say, “I AM AN AMERICAN!”….So why did the Supreeme High Court deny his case to be tried? Because they are subject to some one elses power!….

  45. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha…………hahahahahahah………phew. Dinosaurs lived with humans? Nope. They didnt. That’s a fact. Dinosuars lived 65 millions years ago. Humans are far younger.

    Some people a dumb as shit.

  46. Even with that statement, which is oddly different from the article, BO’s mother was born November 29, 1942 So she turned 14 November 29, 1956 5 year’s after that would be November 29, 1961 When she would be eligible to pass on citizenship to her offspring born abroad.

    Bo was born August 4, 1961 , 3 month’s shy of being eligible for citizenship ASSUMING he was born in Kenya(which is yet to be proven).

    So, I’m assuming your reason behind posting your comment is to show how this site is not based off of facts… Of coarse they are careful to do what they claim Hawaii of doing and using word manipulation and there may be more to it.

    Cause if he was born in Hawaii then that requirement would be waived. Also, there is a difference between citizenship and natural citizen.

    And as far as the dual citizen ship, British law requires the parent’s to be married, and since BO’s father was married when he got married, it wouldn’t have been a legal marriage, so then one could argue there was no dual citizen ship if he WAS actually born in kenya.

    Even if there is an executive order sealing up all of BOS records, does that order carry on to his parents? You mean there are no records of where they were during BO’s birth?

    🙂 It is what it is:) This sites comedic.

  47. This is absolute nonsense, all this blu blu blu had been going on so many years even before Obama was was ever born and the Chinese eating babe you’re taking about has been going on before Obama came into power; I think our so called man of God should do something about that, I don’t know how, but I think its their call. actually I don’t see what is wrong with Obama regime, you have not shown any proof of him not being an American citizen and all I see is that you’re 100% anti Obama or rather an extreme racist.

  48. ‘Regime”? Wedon’t have Regimes in America. “We the People” are the boss here. Obama is NOT a {“Natural-Born” “American”. That is A MANDATORY requirement. Obama is “100 anti” America,a traitor and a fraud. The use of the Race card won’t work. Obama is of mixed race. He is Caucasian as well as Negroid and is of Arab descent.Traitors are not reserved to one race.
    It is a shame for “Black America” that the only “Black” that they could find to run for President is a descendant of Muslkim and White slave traders. Obama does NOT identify with Black Americans. His ancestors were never slaves. His ancestors SOLD slaves:
    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-no-president-obama/

  49. To be the President of the United States or the Vice-President of the United States,for that matter,one MUST BE a “Natural-Born Citizen”. Obama has never BEEN
    a “Natural-Born Citizen” of America. The definition,as found in the “Law of Nations”,referencing International Law,Treaties and Conventions of which the US is a signatory,is:

    “One bornn in a Country of TWO Citizen Parents”. It is irrelevant how immigration/naturalization Laws apply to people other than the POTUS or V-POTUS. These two persons are the only people that are required to meet the STRICTEST standards for office in that regard.

    Congress’s “Power to Define and to Punish…offenses
    of the “Law of Nations” is provided for in Article 1,Sec.8 USConst.

    It is an offense against the sovereignty of the USA and longstanding inter-relationships with all nations for ANY country to allow for the retention in Office of a fraudulently elected Head of State in that the non bona-fides Official’s signature on Treaties,inter alia would render said Treaties null and void and generate grave mistrust in the International milieu.

  50. Since attempting temporarly for any reasonable articles and reviews aimed at this valuable field . Looking over in Search engines I ultimately spotted this article. Reading this information I�m just glad to express that we have a good sense I ran across whatever I became looking for. I undoubtedly are going to be certain to keep this in mind site and check it over consistently.

  51. I’ve been browsing on-line greater than three hours these days, but I by no means found any fascinating article like yours. It is lovely value enough for me. In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made just right content material as you did, the web shall be much more useful than ever before.

  52. […] Which by the way, makes every bill Obama signs, every speech he gives, every order his office hands down to soldiers, and EVERYTHING he DOES acting as president, iLLEGAL, null and void. And pretty much means if we let this go on we are breaking the law right along with him. [see proof here] […]

  53. […] Which by the way, makes every bill Obama signs, every speech he gives, every order his office hands down to soldiers, and EVERYTHING he DOES acting as president, iLLEGAL, null and void. And pretty much means if we let this go on we are breaking the law right along with him. [see proof here] […]

  54. […] Which by the way, makes every bill Obama signs, every speech he gives, every order his office hands down to soldiers, and EVERYTHING he DOES acting as president, iLLEGAL, null and void. And pretty much means if we let this go on we are breaking the law right along with him. [see proof here] […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: