• Secretary of State Requests for Documents, Sample Letter, Contacts, Responses, Proof Obama’s qualifications never verified

The following documents were obtained in trying to decipher who’s legal responsibility it is to verify that a presidential candidate qualifies to run for president, i.e., meets the 3 basic qualifications required by the United States Constitution.  The American public assumes this has been done for all candidates, as it SHOULD BE.  Turns out the sole responsibility a candidate qualifies falls on:

1)  The candidate (Barack Obama)

2) The party (Nancy Pelosi & the DNC Chair)

The candidate


Illegal President Barack Obama


Barack Obama’s sworn, signed and notorized State of Arizona “Candidate Nomination Paper” swearing he’s a “natural born citizen of the United States. THIS DOCUMENT IS MOST SIGNIFCANT BECAUSE HE SPECIFICALLY CERTIFIES HE IS A “NATURAL BORN U.S. CITIZEN.”  [SEE HIS PERJURIOUS STATEMENT HERE]


Here’s my findings:

  • Nancy Pelosi didn’t just certify that Obama was nominated: she certified Obama was DULY nominated. BIG DIFFERENCE.  KEY WORD: “DULY.”

  • “Duly” nominated means “properly” nominated.
  • “Properly” nominated means he met all the legal qualifications for president, including being a natural born citizen. But he was not “duly” [properly] nominated because a candidate cannot be “duly” nominated if they are not a natural born citizen, just like a candidate could not be “duly” nominated if they are under 35 years old.
  • By law, Secretary of States are not responsible nor  have the duty nor are legally authorized to investigate whether a presidential candidate meets the requirements. The Secretary of State is ministerial in the nomination process; by law, as long as the papers are filed properly on their face, the Secretary of State must place the candidate on the ballot. So it will not be winnable to bring lawsuits against the Secretary of State.
  • By state law it is both the national political party and each separate state’s political party’s responsibility.  It is the party’s duty and they have the legal authority and responsibility to investigate and verify whether a candidate meets the requirements, otherwise that candidate cannot truthfully be “duly” nominated. CASE IN POINT:  SEE STATE OF HAWAII OFFICE OF ELECTIONS RESPONSE BELOW WHERE THEY CLEARLY STATE THEY CANNOT PLACE A CANDIDATE ON THE BALLOT UNLESS THEY HAVE A STATEMENT BY THE POLITICAL PARTY THAT EACH CANDIDATE IS LEGALLY QUALIFIED TO SERVE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and more, yet we know for a fact that this was never verified nor qualified since no one has ever actually seen Obama’s real birth certificate because it’s been under lock and key in a vault.
    CLICK HERE-> hawaii-response
  • Nancy Peolsi is in charge of the National Democrat Party so she is ultimately responsible. But although she has a duty to investigate any reasonable doubts about a candidate’s eligibility, she too relies on the DNC Chair of each state’s certification of the candidate and bases her ultimate approval of the candidate on those certifications.  And of course this would be her “legal defense.” However, maybe not a solid defense since there was enough reasonable doubt whether Obama was a natural born US citizen to warrant verification. Yet no verification was done.  Still, may not be a fruitful case against Nancy Pelosi.

  • HERE’S WHERE THE REAL FAULT LIES:  The party Chair of each state:  IT IS THEY THAT must certify their candidate meets all the requirements before the head of the National Democrat party [Nancy Pelosi] can “duly” nominate the candidate. Nancy Pelosi bases her ultimate certification of nomination on their certifications.  Then the Secretary of State places the candidate on the ballot based on all of the above.  Then sadly, the unsuspecting American public goes to the voting booth trusting the candidate was qualified based on that nomination.
  • The fault really falls on the DNC Chairs of each state.  And if any suit is to be brought forth, this is the place to start.  Pick a state, start with one that certified Obama specifically citing he was a natural born U.S. citizen [like Arizona].  And since no one has ever seen Obama’s actual certificate of live birth, since it has been locked in a vault, that is proof his qualifications were never verified, therefore he was not qualified and not duly nominated.  There was also reasonable doubt whether Obama was a natural born US citizen, certainly enough to warrant verification of his certificate of live birth. And because of that, it is a proven fact that was never done.
  • If the court says an American citizen like Berg doesn’t have standing to bring a suit against Obama, perhaps a member of the democrat party [which would mean YOU or any citizen registered as a member of the democrat party] could bring suit or perhaps a class action suit against the democrat party in their state? The premise of the suit would be that they did not verify their candidate’s birthplace status, yet they officially qualified him.  Bringing suit against Nancy Pelosi would be a mess because she would just say she was only relying on the certifications of the state DNC Chairs.  But what legitimate excuse could the DNC Chairs have? CHECK INTO THIS.
  • Perhaps we could start by requesting documents  pursuant to the Public Records Act (PRA) that show the DNC verified that Obama met all the qualifications. Of course they would have to reply back “sorry, your request is denied because we do not have any such documents.” And you know why?  BECAUSE THEY NEVER VETTED NOR VERIFIED Obama.  Certainly there is some kind of law against LYING or making false statements in an official capacity?  They certified he met all the requirements when he doesn’t meet the requirements.  The proof is they never verified his certificate of live birth because his real birth certificate has been locked up in a vault and no one in the DNC has seen it.

Notes how I came to this conclusion are below:

******************* WORKSHEET & NOTES ********************

The following are documents I obtained by emailing my request to the Secretary of State in 50+ states.  My first attempt was to make my requests pursuant to “The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),” but I soon found out by the responses back that individual states are not subject to the FOIA because the FOIA is a FEDERAL agency; and that the proper way to request documents was to make requests pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA).”   I was also told to be more specific in the documents I was requesting.  I then resubmitted my requests pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA) and I requested copies of the filing papers filed by Barack Obama to run for president in each state; and each state’s code of laws for certification of candidates.

NOTE: There were a few Secretary of States that did send me some documents even though they noted in the response that I had sent the request pursuant to the FIOC instead of the proper way to the PRA.

Some SOS offices also told me it would be good to direct my  requests to the State ELECTION BOARD. But regardless  who you attention it to, to  do it pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA),” and NOT THE “Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).”


Report of Findings:

1). Request for documents are to be made pursuant to the “Public Records Act (PRA)” [not the Federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)]

2). Secretary of State not legally responsible nor has the legal authority to determine eligibility or investigate whether a presidential candidate meets all the qualifications.  By law it is the POLITICAL PARTY’S RESPONSIBILITY, aka Nancy Peolsi & the DNC…

Every SOS so far has informed me that by state law, the responsibility to determine eligibility or investigate whether a presidential candidate meets all the qualifications to run for president is the Political Party’s responsibility and not the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State’s role is more of an administrative one, as they have no authority to investigate or question a candidate’s eligibility.  Per law, if the filing documents filed by the political party are complete on their face, The Secretary of State must accept them without question and place the candidate on the ballot.  In Obama’s case, that political party responsible to vet Obama would be the DNC [Democrat Party] under Nancy Pelosi. But since Obama never released his real birth certificate to anyone, then obviously Nancy Peolosi never actually verified if he was qualified or not.  So if there was no “verification” done, then why’d she sign her name certifying Obama was “duly,”[properly] nominated? The official certification of nomination is not an autograph book! The Secretaries of State rely on and trust that official signature signifying everything is in order before they place a candidate on the ballot.  Nancy Pelosi is ultimately responsible for making sure a candidate meets all the presidential requirements.  She did not do that.

THE FOLLOWING ARE RESPONSE LETTERS I GOT BACK FROM SECRETARY OF STATES CONFIRMING “THE STATE IS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE BY LAW TO VERIFY CANDIDATES, AND THAT IS THE DUTY OF THE POLITICAL PARTY.  And if the paperwork appears on its face to be complete, then the state by law MUST place that candidate on the ballot” [I did not post them all because each state  said that same thing]:








3). Obama officially swore in writing in each state he ran for office that he was eligible and met all requirements to run for president.  One particular document [Arizona] he even specifically swore he was a “natural born US citizen.” [HERE]

shockedDISTURBING RESPONSES:This is very troubling and disturbing because we know Obama has never submitted his original certificate of live birth to anyone and it’s been sealed in a vault, so that means that the DNC not only never actually verified whether or not he met the birthplace qualifications, BUT NANCY PELOSI and CAROL FOWLER [DNC CHAIR for the State of South Carolina] and other DNC Chairs CERTIFIED BY SIGNATURE ON OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS SIGNIFYING THAT HE WAS [when he was NOT].


4) Who’s all responsible for and authorized to verify [certify] the candidates meet the requirements to run for president:

a) The candidate



b) Nancy Pelosi [head of DNC]


Nancy Pelosi head of DNC

NANCY PELOSI IS RESPONSIBLE, SHE HAS THE LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DUTY TO INVESTIGATE AND VERIFY CANDIDATES MEET US CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS.  [CLICK BELOW TO SEE HER DISTURBING OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION OF OBAMA, even though his birthplace was not verified].  The state relies on this.  Nancy Pelosi could try to use the excuse that she certified Obama because she relied on the DNC chairs in each state’s certifications that he met all the requirements.

c) The Democrat Party Chairman of each state- the real liability rests HERE. Even the State of Hawaii says so:



[CLICK BELOW TO READ THE STATE DNC’S DISTURBING OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION, CERTIFYING OBAMA MEETS THE QUALIFICATIONS TO RUN AS PRESIDENT when in fact Obama’s birthplace was NEVER even verified]: room does not permit posting every state, but here’s some just to name a few:


Carol Fowler-SC DNC Chair


Laura Sanchez-NM Dem Exec Dir

Joe Turnham ALABAMA Dem Chair

Joe Turnham ALABAMA Dem Chair

Alabama Democrat Party Chairman Certifying under seal of the State Dem Exec Committee of Alabama that Obama filed qualifications with him but also states certification is subject to such disqualifications or corrective action as hereafter may appropriately be made.


Wayne Holland Jr UTAH Dem Chair

[Utah Democrat Party Chairman Wayne Holland Jr certifies to the Lt. Governor that Obama “has met the requirements and approved to run as president,” citing reasons such as public service, political service, accomplishment, public writings, public statements, yet these are NOT presidential requirements. HERE]. and obviously the important Constitutional requirements were not mentioned or verified.


Brian E. Schatz, Chair of Democrat Party of Hawaii

[Hawaii Democrat Party Chair Brian E. Schatz certified that Obama was “legally qualified,” yet has never seen nor inspected Obama’s original certificate of live birth [if he had he would’ve seen it was from Kenya] but he could not have since Obama’s original certificate of live birth has been under lock and key in a vault in his own state that even he was not and is not allowed to see. HERE]

But these are not the only DNC Chairs, each state party also certified Obama met all the requirements.  [Too many to post here.]

5) The fact that hearsay taken out of context and conclusions drawn from unqualified statements  made by Hawaii officials during a media press conference [and not a court of law] were surprisingly actually used and accepted by a judge to substantiate CT Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz’s defense in the Cort Wrotnowski case…per Susan Bysiewicz’s own admission in her letter below.  But still, a mute point, because Secretary of States are not legally responsible to investigate a candidate’s qualifications anyway.  So there’s no winning a suit against them.


Susan Bysiewicz CT Secretary of State


Connecticut Secretary of State [Susan Bysiewicz] defensive statement of excuse defending herself for certifying Obama was qualified to run for president [even though SOS are not responsible for vetting the presidential candidates] based on hearsay taken out of context from some unqualified statements made by Hawaiian officials at a press conference [not a court of law] in November 2008.  She admits the Cort Wrotnowski case was dismissed based on her testimony of such.  The problem with this is that Hawaiian officials never verified that Obama was in fact born in the State of Hawaii and they only said they hold a copy of his “original” birth certificate on file, and they refused to even confirm if that “original” birth certificate was a certificate of live birth in Kenya or Hawaii.  The omittance of appropriate definition of terms, e.g. “certification” vs “certificate of live birth,” and others was sufficient enough to  confuse apparently even the judge Susan Bysiewicz testified to. Also, the date she claims she made this verification [even though SOS are not legally responsible to verify a candidate] was on November 3, 2008 – almot 3 months AFTER the time of the general election. It’s important to note that the candidates were supposed to be verified BEFORE the general election, as a presidential candidate cannot even RUN for the office without being a natural born citizen.  But a mute point since Obama’s birthplace status WAS NEVER VERIFIED IN THE FIRST PLACE because Obama has never released his original certificate of live birth for them to view.

6) The ultimate responsibility to verify if a presidential candidate meets the requirements for the office is the National Party [DNC].  AND regardless of what those  protocols and standard of procedures are, the CONSTITUTION TRUMPS ALL.  And whether or not the official certification signed by Nancy Pelosi or each State DNC Chair specifically states they verified his birthplace, doesn’t matter, because Nancy Pelosi signed her name to a document that says Obama was “DULY NOMINATED,”not just nominated, but DULY nominated.  But Obama was not “duly” [properly] nominated.  And the Secretary of State relies on that signature because it signifies the candidate is in fact qualified per the CONSTITUTION and enables the SOS to place him on the ballot.




1. in a due manner; properly; appropriately, fittingly.

1. In a due, fit, or becoming manner; as it (anything) ought to be; properly; regularly.

[Antonymns:  improperly, unduly, unsuitably.]

Synonym for rightfully (adv): lawfully, correctly, legally, DULY, justly, technically, strictly, fairly, equitably.

[Antonymn: unlawfully.]

Again, read State of Hawaii Office of Elections who says their state law clearly says the political party must provide a statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provivisions of the United States Constitution AND the candidates are duly chosen: hawaii-response


JASON RIGGS of YOUR FELLOW CITIZEN BLOG  is doing some good research and corresponding with various state officials on getting down to the meat of things on this issue.   Read the latest he’s uncovered here: http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/

7) CONCLUSION: WE NEED TO GET SOMEONE to ENFORCE the CONSTITUTION.  The Supreme Court doesn’t seem like they are too interested in doing that, the judges don’t either.  So the real answer is finding a way to ENFORCE THE LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION…and you know the old saying “where there’s a will, there’s a way.”  We must find that way.

AND there must be some way to sue the DNC Chair or DNC Committees; they are the ones that specifically certified that Obama met the qualifications when in fact they never verified that.  It is their certifications that Nancy Pelosi based her certification on.  True, the ULTIMATE responsibility lies with NANCY PELOSI.  But the overt misstatement of facts lies with the DNC Chairs.

Remaining questions:

a) can citizens file a class action suit against the DNC Chairs or committees?

b) how did Obama get a drivers license without a certificate of live birth?

c) how did Obama get a passport without a certificate of live birth?



(or scroll down to view notes, contacts, and sample letter)


Sample letter I used:

Board of Elections, Secretary of State

Attn: Public Records Act, Request for records

This is a request under the Public Records Act (PRA). Please send the following documents for examining and photocopying:

1. Documents that show that Barack Obama is qualified to be President of the United States, including but not limited to:

a. Original birth certificate or document stating he is a  natural born United States citizen

b. DNC or Democrat Party’s Certification of Candidates, whether it pertains to Barack Obama or all candidates in general.

c.  Election Board’s Certification of Candidates, whether it pertains to Barack Obama or all candidates in general.

d.  Official certification of Nomination of Barack Obama.

e. Document containing your state code of laws for certification or candidates; verification of qualifications.

f.  Copies of application, submission or filing forms by Barack Obama to run for president in your state.

This is a continuing request into the future for 6 months.

If this is not the proper department, please forward to the Election Bureau/SOS.

I promise to pay reasonable search and duplication fees in connection with this request.

Please notify me if the charges will exceed ($20.00), so that I can decide whether to authorize a higher amount.

Thank you for your assistance, I look forward to receiving your reply within five business days, as required by law.

A PDF file via email is sufficient or you may mail the hardcopies to me here:

xxxx xxxx
xxxxx. xxxx. xxxxxs
(xxx) xxx-xxxx

Thank you,


Cc: Clerk of the US Supreme Court

One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543

FAX: (209) 479-3021


Should any person try to cover up this request or documents herein, BE YOU HEREBY PUT ON NOTICE: You may be indicted under USC Title 18 Sec. 3. 4, 2381, 2382, 2383, and 2384. Also, 4 U.S.C. & 101, federal law requires all state employees and officers take an oath of office and records kept of such administered oath.


(or scroll down to view contacts)


Here’s the link where I got each Secretary of State’s fax numbers:

I also sent requests via email.  Here are the email addresses I sent them to: (YOU CAN JUST COPY AND PASTE INTO YOUR BCC:)








susan.bysiewicz@po.state.ct.us ,

lorilee.harrison@state.de.us ,










sos.secretary@ky.gov, bobby.jindal@la.gov,






































(or just click on ASK THE ANIMALS header at top of each page)

Published in: on December 2, 2008 at 7:04 am  Comments (22)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/secretary-of-state-requests-for-documents-sample-letter-responses-say-obamas-qualifications-never-verified/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

22 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. […] **SECRETARY OF STATE & DNC ELECTION BOARD DOCUMENTS [CT & SC] prove Obama’s birthplace… […]

  2. […] Tip: Monique Monicat Secretary of State Requests for Documents, Sample Letter, Contacts, Responses, Proof Obama’s quali… Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Campaign Team Barack Obama Won’t Produce […]

  3. Monique Thank you for your absolutely stellar work.

    Hang onto the docuements. Also, you may want to send copies to Trevor Loudon at “New Zeal” blog. He has done superlative working documenting that Ovama is a signed up and in Communist.

    Having copies of these valuable documents you dug up – off shore in New Zealand may come in handy if Bambi is sworn in. Baqmbi has tagged Eric Schmidt of Google to be his “technical” person. We all know how articles, you tubes and etc disappeared during the primaries and general.

    Again, my sincere appreciation for fantastic work. Have you sent copies of these to Berg and all the others?

    ********TO NELLIE FROM MONIQUE**********

  4. So what happens now? Will Nancy Pelosi and state democratic party chairs be held responsible for their dereliction of duty?
    Why is Obama still an Indonesian citizen?

  5. Thanks for your work!

    So should a lasuit be brought against Nancy Pelosi and the DNC then? Who can we inform of this? Does Berg or Martin know this?

    Also, have you shared your fact-gathering with news outlets? They probably won’t follow up though, because they didn’t even cover this question in the first place. Maybe the best place would be to concerned citizens or citizens like Berg who can spend their time suing. This ought to be good. Now there’s all sorts of questions swirling around Obama and Chicago dirty politics. Seems like a good time.

  6. It seems like the US Passport agency would have some information on file for Obama to obtain a Diplomatic Passport. What happen with the break in case of the passport agency? The whole incident just vanished. Are there others higher ups involved with Obama’s rising to power? Was Obama behind the break in? It seems like the would have back up information on back up? You simply cannot live and travel in this Country with out a trace unless you are here illegally. Especially after 9/11.

  7. A lot of people here including the owner of this f****** website are fools with no brains at all.I think you guys just cannot figure out how and why a blackman should rule this country,I will tell you how and why.Everything that has a start must end one day.The ols ways of doing and seeing things are gone and it appears you guys have missed the train.You can connive,collaborate and sniff around as much as you like,it is TIME for a change and it is happening right in fron of your ugly faces right now.Live with it or move to Zimbabwe.


    Racial discrimination and/or skin color obsession is not allowed on this site, and words describing perverse sexual acts are not either, so that word was replaced with asterisks.

    Obama’s forgery stands on its own. The birth certification has already been proven as a fraud and nothing you nor I nor anyone else can change that fact. We see it and have called him out on it.

    What you’re really saying behind all your bullshevik is telling me and others to shut up about the truth. No can do bro; in America it’s called freedom of speech. So it is you that will also have to live with it or move to Zimbabwe.

  8. I agree with what you say, but PLEASE STOP referring to the Democrat Party as the “Democratic” Party. They are NOT “democratic” by ANY stretch, and you do not call the Republican Party the “Republicrat” Party, do you?

    “Democratic” is far too good for them, just as “gay” is far too favorable a term to use instead of the word “homosexual,” or “sodomite.”

    **** MODERATOR’S REPLY *********

    RIGHTY-O – YOU ARE CORRECT!********* Thanks, I will remember that, I’ll have to go back through this blog and correct to “democrat,” because you are so right, there’s nothing democratic about them, period! –mque 🙂

  9. PS – I found your blog while searching for photographs of Nancy Pelosi. Even the “best” photos of her reveal, in my unprofessional,(though do bear in mind that many psychiatric “professionals” are nuts themselves), opinion, that she is mentally deranged.

    Excellent response to “Walter Redd,” by the way. It’s very clear to anyone willing to open his eyes to the truth that Obama was, to a significant degree, elected to the Presidency as a result of “reverse racism.” That is, great numbers of blacks, including Colin Powell, as well as many empty-headed whites, voted for him because he is part black.

    Many others voted for Obama because they believed “Anything’s better than Bush!” As for me, I know very well that on this earth, “no matter how bad things get, they can ALWAYS get worse.” THAT is why governmental “change” must be VERY CAREFULLY CONTEMPLATED before EVER embarking on such. But instead, 52% of the people in this country voted for a wholesale “change” of government without having the slightest idea of what that “change” would entail!

    Blessings on you and yours,


  10. Dear Yitzchach,

    Thanks, glad you stopped by. I will add one thing, I believe that out of that 52% many of those votes were tainted, obtained through cheating.

    –mque 🙂

  11. Hi,

    I stumbled upon your site while doing background research on the upcoming Obama/Cheney terror speech duel.

    I was a little confused at first and thought this website was a joke. I just couldn’t grasp that there are still people in the world who actually think like this, and smart ones at that. Unfortunately for the world I’m pretty sure this is real. I uphold your right to publish this and at the same time am embarrassed for the good people of my church and that this dribble is being posted on the internet in the name of my faith.

    While you misinterpret the King James bible which is itself a poor translation of previously poorly translated manuscripts please keep in mind that blind reliance on the truth of others leads you down the path to the devil and not to the house of the Lord.

    And while you betray your seemingly adequate intellect with freakishly OCD type focus on things that don’t matter in the bigger picture, please look up to realize that you are displaying the same kind of fundamentally blind ignorance that fuels Al Qaeda and other dangerous fringe groups both inside this country and outside our borders.

    There is a clause in the constitution that mandates the separation of church and state for one very good reason. That reason being that there is nothing more dangerous than a quack in power with “the word of god” spewing out of his mouth even if it’s in the name of the same god that I believe in.

    The Bible teaches most of all that we learn to accept and love our neighbor. In my church that means loving and striving to understand people of all religions not just mine.


    Thanks for taking the time out and commenting. I appreciate your honesty–at least sincerity of the start of your email admitting you were confused and you thought it was a joke part. Fair enough. And sincerely, I even got a chuckle about the OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder) comment you made. Please try to remember not everyone in America comes from the same culture as you. But then you go downhill from there, resorting to generalization (accusations of misinterpreting the King James bible, without citing any examples), roundabout name calling, arrogance, and ignorance of what the bible teaches. Okay, maybe ignorance is too strong of a word, perhaps laziness is more accurate. I say laziness because you obviously have not taken the time or the discipline to study what is clearly stated in the bible, when it contradicts or goes beyond your own belief. Or, you don’t believe the bible is to be taken literally. If so, well, fair enough.

    And PLEASE for the sake of TRUTH and HONESTY cite the instance of the misinterpretation of the scripture of the King James you noted!

    You yourself did some misinterpreting of the truth when you said:

    “The Bible teaches most of all that we learn to accept and love our neighbor. In my church that means loving and striving to understand people of all religions not just mine.”

    This is not entirely incorrect, although the bible does teach we are to love our neighbor as ourselves, and the example Jesus gives us is the good Samaritan, it does not teach that we “learn to accept our neighbor” in the context that we accept a lie. And we were never instructed to “strive” to “understand” people of all religions. We were, however, instructed to feed the poor, give water to the thirsty, clothe the naked, visit the sick and those in jail, cast out demons, and spread the gospel, all with one purpose in mind: to lead men and women to the Lord Jesus Christ and to God. That is what Jesus defined as loving your neighbor as yourself. Love, in this instance is a VERB, an action. Acts of kindness, not “feelings.”

    When was the last time you cast out a demon? When is the last time you visited someone in jail? These were direct instructions from Jesus as well.

    Jesus was not understanding of all people’s religions. Quite the contrary, He told a group of the religious leaders they were going to hell because they did not believe in Him. That’s not “very understanding” of others’ religions now, is it? Still, if any one of them was lying down beaten and bleeding to death, Jesus would not have left them there. And neither would nor have I. Regardless of who they were.

    After all, even the good Samaritan didn’t involve himself in trying to “understand” the man of the other religion he helped, he just helped him because he was hurt, bloody, and dying, and it was the right and good thing to do.

    But let’s just cut out all the bullshevik and be HONEST here okay?

    Because ironically, the very thing you claim you and your church strive to do, which in your words is to “strive to understand and accept other people of all religions,” is the very opposite thing you yourself have done here in your short visit to this blog. Telling me my religion is wrong and calling what might in fact be a simple cultural difference you don’t recognize, as “OCD.”

    Try being fair with others and honest with yourself. Remember, if one is to be fair, one cannot tout tolerance in one breath and condemnation in the next.

  12. FYI…you have posted an incorrect picture of Joe Turnham, Chairman of the Alabama Democratic Party. The picture depicting Joe is not him. I recommend going to http://www.joeturnham.com for an actual picture of him.

    ********MODERATOR’S THANKS************
    Thanks Todd. Fixed!

  13. Great work, Monique, and I support any effort to bring suit against Nancy Pelosi. But I wouldn’t put quite so much stress on the word “duly” because the content of her false swearing is stronger than that one word.

    In the DNC’s “Official Certification of Nomination” (August 28, 2008) Pelosi stated her official, sworn, notarized lie that Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” That is the strong rope you hang her with, not the stringy little word “duly.”

    Moreover, this does not depend solely on the lack of birthplace verification. Since Obama’s father was British, Obama held divided allegiance at birth and on that basis alone is disqualified. And now there a “Certificate of Birth” from Kenya, complete with hospital name, official signature, and baby’s footprint that says Obama was born in Kenya.

  14. A good analysis of who might be sued; unfortunately, all that any suits against the Democrat Party chairmen could do is potentially punish them (individually) for improperly certifying Obama. Further more, it would be difficult to prove that they were negligent, because Obama did produce an official-looking document, and the witness statements to his birth in Kenya were not commonly known. That is, they could simply claim they were duped.

    The real question is, how can an already sworn in President, later found to be constitutionally ineligible for the position, be removed? The problem is that the courts have treated Obama’s constitutional ineligibility in the same manner as someone who may have been improperly put on the ballot, but constitutionally eligible.

    For example, if state laws prohibited convicts from the ballot, but the DNC approved a convict who was eventually elected, then the DNC might be liable for the finagle, but the only means of removal would be impeachment.

    In the case of Obama, constitutional ineligibility is constitutional ineligibility. He does not need to be impeached, because he cannot be President. So what is the proper course of action? The Constitution does not provide for the occasion that the candidate falsely represented himself, and was later discovered. As near as I can tell, the only thing that need be done is the swearing in of the Vice-president (the runner up), since the “winner” was ineligible, and there is currently no President. In other words, it is Joe Bidden’s duty to demand to be sworn in, and begin execution of the duties of the office. If Bidden refuses to take office, then it is as good as a withdrawal, and it falls on the next runner-up, John McCain. If he refuses, then Sarah Palin.

    So it is simple, all that need be done is for Bidden to refuse, and then McCain to show up and demand to be sworn in as the rightful President.

    In the mean time, no Bill can become law. Everything Obama signs is invalid. He cannot even send US attorneys into the courts. Every American becomes a victim, and every bureaucracy that enforces a Bill signed by Obama becomes a perpetrator.

    Unfortunately, any case alleging invalidity due to Obama’s ineligibility will soon be dismissed as frivolous, although the Constitution itself makes such arguments legally and clearly valid. These cases will need to be pursued all the way to the Supreme Court. A case will be dismissed, it will need to be appealed for improper dismissal, and then that appeal will need to be appealed itself. Eventually, the Supreme Court will need to decide if a law signed by a constitutionally ineligible President is a properly enacted law. These arguments will need to be based on prima facia evidence that Obama is indeed ineligible for the office, such as his validated Kenyan birth certificate and witness statements.

  15. Excellent analysis.  Thanks for stopping by and delivering. 

    It is so very sad that the American judicial system is in the state it’s in that anyone could use the “we were duped” defense.  The Italian consulate is so very meticulous about every single document presented for citizenship, we even have to go to court if our name is in Italian and our Americanized name is in English on any of the documents, even if it differs by one letter.  Otherwise they will not accept it, because they know once it gets to Italy it will be rejected, even with one letter incorrect and everything must be notarized and every document verified, no copies of birth certificates, only certified original birth certificates are accepted.  Sometimes the paperwork alone takes a year to prepare in a way it will be acceptable.

    And then we have the mighty USA who takes the word of a copy they “heard was posted on Obama’s website” as enough documentation?

    Seems to me any excuse of “we were duped,” would be completely inadequate, if not absurd.

    If the “we were duped” excuse could be used successfully then that really shows how degraded our judicial system has become.

    But then again, here we have an actor (Obama) who gets a nobel peace prize, when he will be the reason for the next civil war in America.  NewSpeak has never been finer.

  16. My sister was born in Japan. The joke growing up was “are you a jap”? The answer to that is no. She was born to American citizens (military personell) which makes her an american citizen any way you slice it.
    I find this type of rhetoric very disturbing. Obama should be prayed for. He is our president. and, if as christians we believe all authority is granted by God himself, what does this argument say about your faith? Why are you trying so hard to denigrate this man? Because you didn’t vote for him and you are a sore looser? I didn’t vote for him either, but, he is a natural born American citizen just as my sister is, because he was born of American citizenship. So, your well researched argument is moot.

    ********COMMENT FROM MONIQUE*************
    Hello Eve,

    I understand your position. I too have a sibling who was born in another country (Panama). However, in our family no one ever joked about it because we were not all born in America so it would not enter in our minds to do so. And we experienced far worse treatment from outside the family than name calling. Life goes on and we don’t cry about it. Some of us hold dual citizenship and some of us are natural born and some of us have been naturalized. Those of us who were naturalized and those of us that hold dual citizenship would NOT be eligible for the office of presidency, although we can be legal citizens of both countries.

    However, the debate is not about being an “American Citizen” nor about being a child born to military parents. It is about being a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN as is spelled out as a requirement for presidency in the US Constitution.

    A big problem for Obama is that he was holding dual citizenship at the time of his birth, really regardless of where he was born, that alone makes him unqualified to be president. Dual citizenship in American was not allowed at the time of his birth.

    You may find this disturbing if you are not reading your bible because it is pretty clear that we are to pray for our leaders’ SALVATION. No where in the bible nor in any of the stories about Jesus nor any of the apostles nor the prophets of the Old Testament does it tell us to pray for a leader in any other intention other than FOR THEIR SALVATION. I think most everyone on this blog has prayed for Obama’s salvation. That is in God’s hands and up to Obama.

    It is a little “disturbing” that you seem to be so concerned that folks ought to be praying for Obama, instead of calling him out on fraud, do not extend the same to the writers on this blog. Questioning your fellow citizens who are obligated as a duty of a citizen of the United States to uphold the supreme law of the land, the US Constitution, even wondering if we are doing that for something so ridiculous as being “sore losers” over an election?

    Don’t you find that just a little bit dishonest on your part?

    Breaking the laws of the supreme law of the land is called “lawlessness,” and the bible speaks against lawlessness throughout. John the Baptist, whom our Lord Jesus Christ said was the greatest man that ever lived, shouted out to Herod routinely against his sinning by being married to his brother’s wife. Remember, he got his head chopped off for it.

    This just in from a Christian site called People’s Passion:
    God says, “The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
    but the heart of the fool to the left.”
    Ecclesiastes 10:2 (New International Version)

    “Pray for Obama! Click – Psalm 109:8”.
    Psalm 109:8 (New International Version)

    “8 May his days be few;
    may another take his place of leadership.”

  17. Here is what the constitution states per http://www.constitution.net: note that a ‘Natural-born citizen’ includes a person born to any american citizen who has lived in the United States for at least one year of their life. That would include Obama’s situation IF he were born in Kenya or Indonesia or wherever it doesn’t matter if his mother was (as she is) a citizen who at some time in her life lived at least a year in the States.

    Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?

    The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.

    Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

    Anyone born inside the United States *
    Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
    Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
    Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
    Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
    Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
    Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
    A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

    *******MODERATOR REPLY ******************
    Incorrect sir.

    First, let’s cut the military stuff all together, Obama was not in the military so that has nothing to do with anything. And let’s cut out all the nonsensical fluff about “citizenship,” as we are talking about being a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN ONLY.

    There is no “1 year” requirement for a parent as you state. The law is very clear that at the time of Obama’s birth states that if only one parent was a US citizen at the time of your birth that parent had to have resided in the United States for 10 years and 5 OF THOSE YEARS HAD TO BE AFTER THE AGE OF 16.

    Obama’s mom was 18 when she birthed him, so she was not residing in the United States for 5 years, only 2, so she is shy of the 3 additional years required.

    But Obama’s got bigger problems than that. There is the problem of his dual citizenship which at the time of his birth, dual citizenship was not allowed in America.

    I understand you as an American who takes citizenship for granted would not understand how important citizenship laws are, but take it from folks who hold dual citizenship and those who became naturalized, it is. For instance, one day either way can prevent citizenship in this country and most other countries in the world. Some might make exceptions — but not for 3 years. You do not know that since you have never applied for citizenship so you are speaking out of naivety.

    BUT AGAIN, WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT NATURALIZED CITIZENSHIP, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP. And no person born at the time of Obama was allowed to hold dual citizenship. And if he was born in Kenya, that disqualifies him as being “natural born on US soil.”

    The law is the law.

    Now, if you want to disregard the law and tie pieces of it together to make a quilt you so you can sleep at night knowing that Obama fits your qualifications for president, even though he is illegally in office, that is up to you.

  18. Hello My name is Ken and I would like to know how to get a letter comfirming that I am not married. I am trying to goto Tashkent Uzbekistan to marry a women there and I need that document. What do I need to do??? Thank you so much…Ken

  19. […] writer states that Secretaries of State are not responsible for vetting presidential candidates, but rather, it is, in fact, the political parties who are […]

  20. Aw, this has been such a excellent place. In theory Let me produce like this also — taking time and then legitimate work to have a great information… but what precisely will i say… Simply put i put things a fantastic amount and never seem so you can get things implemented… Take care

  21. Hi, do you wish to present commentary not to mention oneway inbound links for you to numerous information internet pages totally? Blogging site Review Poster can do the software for you personally. Web site Comment Poster could lift up your targeted prospects, 1 way links in addition to proceeds far! Noises neat? Absolutely, it is nice! Assures to be the suitable currency trading discourse submitting utility on the online market place with many different top-notch components. Go here!

  22. michael kors watch macys Womens

    • Secretary of State Requests for Documents, Sample Letter, Contacts, Responses, Proof Obama’s qualifications never verified | ASK THE ANIMALS and they will TEACH you… [Job 12:7-12]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: